▲ 15 ▼ The Fall of Stack Overflow (programming.dev) submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by BenLloydPearson@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev 58 comments fedilink hide all child comments Stack Overflow has seen a substantial decline in traffic over the last year that appears to be accelerating. https://observablehq.com/@ayhanfuat/the-fall-of-stack-overflow
[–] gnus_migrate@programming.dev 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) We're not able to properly define general intelligence, let alone build something that qualifies as intelligent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gosling@lemmy.world 39 points 3 years ago I can think of four aspects needed to emulate human response: basic knowledge on various topics, logical reasoning, contextual memory, and ability to communicate; and ChatGPT seems to possess all four to a certain degree. Regardless of what you think is or isn't intelligent, for programming help you just need something to go through tons of text and present the information most likely to help you, maybe modify it a little to fit your context. That doesn't sound too far fetched considering what we have today and how much information are available on the internet permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gosling@lemmy.world 39 points 3 years ago I can think of four aspects needed to emulate human response: basic knowledge on various topics, logical reasoning, contextual memory, and ability to communicate; and ChatGPT seems to possess all four to a certain degree. Regardless of what you think is or isn't intelligent, for programming help you just need something to go through tons of text and present the information most likely to help you, maybe modify it a little to fit your context. That doesn't sound too far fetched considering what we have today and how much information are available on the internet permalink fedilink source parent