The key point that I'm trying to make here though is that all of the Jewish profits foretold of the Christ and he was the Christ as far as all the Christians see it. However, all of the Jews and islamists would call him a prophet as they do not believe that he was the Christ.

"Prophet" has a specific meaning, it's not just a soothsayer. Prophecy is tied to the ends of eras, and for the Semitic people, most of their history was, at that point, servitude of one form or another, punctuated by suffering and occasionally vengeful conquest. The Jewish Prophets fortold the Messiah, who would lead them from suffering to paradise.

Christ, in Christian theology, upended that order. He said he was the new Law, and the only way to God was through him. He was pretty clear on the subject. It didn't take long before new Prophecies came about - but now, the people of God weren't just a specific tribe, they were potentially the whole species. So the prophecies had to be Apocalyptic.

Christ wasn't a Prophet. He brought God's message (according to him and his fans), but he didn't say jack about the End Times.

See my reply to ochi in the other thread. Note I was raised Orthodox and from what I understand, reformist Christian sects do not place as much emphasis on the Trinity