▲ 691 ▼ Funniest part is: they can't even agree internally on how to believe (feddit.org) submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world 132 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I fail to understand why, in religion as in politics by the way, differences and disagreements should be a problem. Diversity is a strength! permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] remon@ani.social 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Because there is a bunch of old books that say so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zloubida@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago You obviously didn't read the Bible, you can't find two pages that agree with each other, and that didn't bother the redactors of the Bible. permalink fedilink source parent [–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Idiots want to dominante I guess. Smart people want to learn. They are not smart. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That's how I view different religions. Each one has one part of a big picture and a bunch of extra fluff. The trouble is that people tend to think that the extra fluff is just as important as the core message, and religions as a organizations encourage it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zloubida@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I like to compare religions to languages. They are tools to speak about the unspeakable, but they don't necessary oppose each other when they have different doctrines, like French doesn't oppose English when it calls “maison” what English calls “house”. By definition, God is a reality that exists outside time and space, there's no way our mind can define it. But like you need a language to speak, you need to practice a religion to develop your spirituality, even if you know that your religion is not the only way to develop it. You can also speak more than one language, and you can practice more than one religion, but it's harder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's a great way to see it, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zloubida@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago You're welcome :-) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] remon@ani.social 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Because there is a bunch of old books that say so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zloubida@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago You obviously didn't read the Bible, you can't find two pages that agree with each other, and that didn't bother the redactors of the Bible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago You obviously didn't read the Bible, you can't find two pages that agree with each other, and that didn't bother the redactors of the Bible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Idiots want to dominante I guess. Smart people want to learn. They are not smart. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That's how I view different religions. Each one has one part of a big picture and a bunch of extra fluff. The trouble is that people tend to think that the extra fluff is just as important as the core message, and religions as a organizations encourage it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zloubida@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I like to compare religions to languages. They are tools to speak about the unspeakable, but they don't necessary oppose each other when they have different doctrines, like French doesn't oppose English when it calls “maison” what English calls “house”. By definition, God is a reality that exists outside time and space, there's no way our mind can define it. But like you need a language to speak, you need to practice a religion to develop your spirituality, even if you know that your religion is not the only way to develop it. You can also speak more than one language, and you can practice more than one religion, but it's harder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's a great way to see it, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zloubida@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago You're welcome :-) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I like to compare religions to languages. They are tools to speak about the unspeakable, but they don't necessary oppose each other when they have different doctrines, like French doesn't oppose English when it calls “maison” what English calls “house”. By definition, God is a reality that exists outside time and space, there's no way our mind can define it. But like you need a language to speak, you need to practice a religion to develop your spirituality, even if you know that your religion is not the only way to develop it. You can also speak more than one language, and you can practice more than one religion, but it's harder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's a great way to see it, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zloubida@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago You're welcome :-) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That's a great way to see it, thanks for sharing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zloubida@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago You're welcome :-) permalink fedilink source parent