▲ 1054 ▼ do as i say... (lemmy.ca) submitted 2 years ago by xia@lemmy.ca to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml 110 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] lauha@lemmy.one 16 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Pros use computer names like Server newerserver newnewerserver latestserver Newlatestserver permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) My home lab took that personally, how dare permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) My SSID's are still listed as Testnet and Testnet5 after years. Had to test something at one point, it worked and never cared to go back and update things. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Totally Everlasting SSID Title net the 5th permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Totally Everlasting SSID Title never ever transformed the 5th fixed it for you :) acronyms with full words in the middle of them are not acronyms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago You are correct, however 5 is actually short for 5725 ... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I once worked in a company that named theirs servers server1, server2, server3, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lauha@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) That atleast makes them (hopefully) chronological and easy to refer to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago* Unfortunately no. The servers were set up when needed for whatever was needed. server2 was the AD, server1 had a business application running, server3 had backup and time tracking … it was a whole mess. Edit: the the memories come back. Nothing was virtualized. server2 was an old Dell tower computer running Windows 2000 on the bare metal and server1 was manually installed Debian with kernel 2.6.*something*. permalink fedilink source parent [–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago but easy to mix up permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) My home lab took that personally, how dare permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) My SSID's are still listed as Testnet and Testnet5 after years. Had to test something at one point, it worked and never cared to go back and update things. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Totally Everlasting SSID Title net the 5th permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Totally Everlasting SSID Title never ever transformed the 5th fixed it for you :) acronyms with full words in the middle of them are not acronyms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago You are correct, however 5 is actually short for 5725 ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) My SSID's are still listed as Testnet and Testnet5 after years. Had to test something at one point, it worked and never cared to go back and update things. 🤷♂️ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Totally Everlasting SSID Title net the 5th permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Totally Everlasting SSID Title never ever transformed the 5th fixed it for you :) acronyms with full words in the middle of them are not acronyms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago You are correct, however 5 is actually short for 5725 ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Totally Everlasting SSID Title net the 5th permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Totally Everlasting SSID Title never ever transformed the 5th fixed it for you :) acronyms with full words in the middle of them are not acronyms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago You are correct, however 5 is actually short for 5725 ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Totally Everlasting SSID Title never ever transformed the 5th fixed it for you :) acronyms with full words in the middle of them are not acronyms permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago You are correct, however 5 is actually short for 5725 ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago You are correct, however 5 is actually short for 5725 ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I once worked in a company that named theirs servers server1, server2, server3, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lauha@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) That atleast makes them (hopefully) chronological and easy to refer to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago* Unfortunately no. The servers were set up when needed for whatever was needed. server2 was the AD, server1 had a business application running, server3 had backup and time tracking … it was a whole mess. Edit: the the memories come back. Nothing was virtualized. server2 was an old Dell tower computer running Windows 2000 on the bare metal and server1 was manually installed Debian with kernel 2.6.*something*. permalink fedilink source parent [–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago but easy to mix up permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lauha@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) That atleast makes them (hopefully) chronological and easy to refer to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago* Unfortunately no. The servers were set up when needed for whatever was needed. server2 was the AD, server1 had a business application running, server3 had backup and time tracking … it was a whole mess. Edit: the the memories come back. Nothing was virtualized. server2 was an old Dell tower computer running Windows 2000 on the bare metal and server1 was manually installed Debian with kernel 2.6.*something*. permalink fedilink source parent [–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago but easy to mix up permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago* Unfortunately no. The servers were set up when needed for whatever was needed. server2 was the AD, server1 had a business application running, server3 had backup and time tracking … it was a whole mess. Edit: the the memories come back. Nothing was virtualized. server2 was an old Dell tower computer running Windows 2000 on the bare metal and server1 was manually installed Debian with kernel 2.6.*something*. permalink fedilink source parent