▲ 865 ▼ AdNauseam is a uBlock fork that goes further: it actively attacks marketers by auto-clicking every ad before blocking (adnauseam.io) submitted 1 year ago by joshchandra@midwest.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 172 comments fedilink hide all child comments It garbles advertisers' data as a result, but you must disable uBlock Origin to run it; they can't work simultaneously. I recently moved to it and, so far, am never looking back!
[–] Tja@programming.dev 63 points 1 year ago (7 children) That's not how IP addresses work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] yarr@feddit.nl 24 points 1 year ago (2 children) What if we use a Visual Basic UI to hack the IP address by netmask? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, but this only works if you connect your VPN via 3 block chain proxies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Make sure you're behind a 54mghz ram modem firewall permalink fedilink source parent [–] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Is it from this? https://youtu.be/hkDD03yeLnU permalink fedilink source parent [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] lumony@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I liked your post ❤️ permalink fedilink source parent [–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago Feed it SQL injections? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children) Have it form connections to all the other browsers using the extension and they all send a click. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Naw, it’s an MMORPG. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Is the botnet itself breaking the law or is breaking the law with a botnet breaking the law? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 7toed@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago Okay okay, how about a counter that is updated with each user clicking on an ad, and the client can decide what they want to do with that information, totally not a botnet right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 1 year ago peer networks are not illegal if the peers are consenting members. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 year ago It just changes the user agent instead... permalink fedilink source parent [–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) You can fake your IP. There isnt really any authentication at the IP level. Just make a packet and overwite the IP field. Edit: I was corrected. The TCP handshake requires you to have a valid IP you can respond from. So even though you can fake your IP, you can't use that to talk to most websites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Tja@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago (1 child) You need a TCP handshake prior to sending any http payload. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago Oh yeah. Forgot about that. permalink fedilink source parent [+] lumony@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) I misremembered my internet class. Sucks that it made ya feel bad. Edit: and you can put whatever you want as your source IP at the IP level. Though idk how modern security deals with that. I know I was taught that that was a way to DoS attack, so I imagine it's protected against. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flux@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago If you just do it on your own computer, the packet will be already dropped by your own gateway. You can fake whichever address in your local subnet, but those are very likely remapped anyway in your gw to the one given by your ISP. If you would have access to the switch port used by your ISP in the Internet exchange point (IX), you would have more liberties in choosing the IP. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Nothing is random In bot cases like this you would have a proxy list that it “randomly” picks from permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumony@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You would need to literally connect to a proxy and send the request through that proxy in order for ads to see an IP different than you own. Yes that is what was proposed, you’re the only one who seems unclear on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumony@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 1 point 1 year ago I said the end goal in my top level comment. I didn't go into methodology because I figured someone else could do it more eloquently; thank you for doing so. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) It does if it reports the URL to click home somewhere and users can opt in to pull the list to auto click. It would DDoS the ad servers. Muwhahahaa permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes. That’s just what I want. An extension sending all ads served to me to a central location, so my fingerprint can be very easily indexed and stored on a definitely never hacked, leaked, or sold database. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago And it would totally never get abused or hit a false positive. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago* Totally doable if this was a distributed service. ok not randomly generated, but you know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 24 points 1 year ago (2 children) What if we use a Visual Basic UI to hack the IP address by netmask? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, but this only works if you connect your VPN via 3 block chain proxies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Make sure you're behind a 54mghz ram modem firewall permalink fedilink source parent [–] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Is it from this? https://youtu.be/hkDD03yeLnU permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, but this only works if you connect your VPN via 3 block chain proxies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Make sure you're behind a 54mghz ram modem firewall permalink fedilink source parent
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Make sure you're behind a 54mghz ram modem firewall permalink fedilink source parent
[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Is it from this? https://youtu.be/hkDD03yeLnU permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] lumony@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I liked your post ❤️ permalink fedilink source parent [–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago Feed it SQL injections? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lumony@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I liked your post ❤️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I liked your post ❤️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago Feed it SQL injections? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children) Have it form connections to all the other browsers using the extension and they all send a click. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Naw, it’s an MMORPG. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Is the botnet itself breaking the law or is breaking the law with a botnet breaking the law? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 7toed@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago Okay okay, how about a counter that is updated with each user clicking on an ad, and the client can decide what they want to do with that information, totally not a botnet right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 1 year ago peer networks are not illegal if the peers are consenting members. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 year ago It just changes the user agent instead... permalink fedilink source parent
[+] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Naw, it’s an MMORPG. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Is the botnet itself breaking the law or is breaking the law with a botnet breaking the law? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 7toed@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago Okay okay, how about a counter that is updated with each user clicking on an ad, and the client can decide what they want to do with that information, totally not a botnet right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 1 year ago peer networks are not illegal if the peers are consenting members. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Naw, it’s an MMORPG. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Is the botnet itself breaking the law or is breaking the law with a botnet breaking the law? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 7toed@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago Okay okay, how about a counter that is updated with each user clicking on an ad, and the client can decide what they want to do with that information, totally not a botnet right? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 7toed@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago Okay okay, how about a counter that is updated with each user clicking on an ad, and the client can decide what they want to do with that information, totally not a botnet right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 7toed@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago Okay okay, how about a counter that is updated with each user clicking on an ad, and the client can decide what they want to do with that information, totally not a botnet right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 point 1 year ago peer networks are not illegal if the peers are consenting members. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 year ago It just changes the user agent instead... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) You can fake your IP. There isnt really any authentication at the IP level. Just make a packet and overwite the IP field. Edit: I was corrected. The TCP handshake requires you to have a valid IP you can respond from. So even though you can fake your IP, you can't use that to talk to most websites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Tja@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago (1 child) You need a TCP handshake prior to sending any http payload. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago Oh yeah. Forgot about that. permalink fedilink source parent [+] lumony@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) I misremembered my internet class. Sucks that it made ya feel bad. Edit: and you can put whatever you want as your source IP at the IP level. Though idk how modern security deals with that. I know I was taught that that was a way to DoS attack, so I imagine it's protected against. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flux@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago If you just do it on your own computer, the packet will be already dropped by your own gateway. You can fake whichever address in your local subnet, but those are very likely remapped anyway in your gw to the one given by your ISP. If you would have access to the switch port used by your ISP in the Internet exchange point (IX), you would have more liberties in choosing the IP. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tja@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago (1 child) You need a TCP handshake prior to sending any http payload. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago Oh yeah. Forgot about that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago Oh yeah. Forgot about that. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lumony@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) I misremembered my internet class. Sucks that it made ya feel bad. Edit: and you can put whatever you want as your source IP at the IP level. Though idk how modern security deals with that. I know I was taught that that was a way to DoS attack, so I imagine it's protected against. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flux@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago If you just do it on your own computer, the packet will be already dropped by your own gateway. You can fake whichever address in your local subnet, but those are very likely remapped anyway in your gw to the one given by your ISP. If you would have access to the switch port used by your ISP in the Internet exchange point (IX), you would have more liberties in choosing the IP. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) I misremembered my internet class. Sucks that it made ya feel bad. Edit: and you can put whatever you want as your source IP at the IP level. Though idk how modern security deals with that. I know I was taught that that was a way to DoS attack, so I imagine it's protected against. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flux@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago If you just do it on your own computer, the packet will be already dropped by your own gateway. You can fake whichever address in your local subnet, but those are very likely remapped anyway in your gw to the one given by your ISP. If you would have access to the switch port used by your ISP in the Internet exchange point (IX), you would have more liberties in choosing the IP. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flux@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago If you just do it on your own computer, the packet will be already dropped by your own gateway. You can fake whichever address in your local subnet, but those are very likely remapped anyway in your gw to the one given by your ISP. If you would have access to the switch port used by your ISP in the Internet exchange point (IX), you would have more liberties in choosing the IP. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Nothing is random In bot cases like this you would have a proxy list that it “randomly” picks from permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumony@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You would need to literally connect to a proxy and send the request through that proxy in order for ads to see an IP different than you own. Yes that is what was proposed, you’re the only one who seems unclear on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumony@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 1 point 1 year ago I said the end goal in my top level comment. I didn't go into methodology because I figured someone else could do it more eloquently; thank you for doing so. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lumony@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You would need to literally connect to a proxy and send the request through that proxy in order for ads to see an IP different than you own. Yes that is what was proposed, you’re the only one who seems unclear on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumony@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 1 point 1 year ago I said the end goal in my top level comment. I didn't go into methodology because I figured someone else could do it more eloquently; thank you for doing so. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You would need to literally connect to a proxy and send the request through that proxy in order for ads to see an IP different than you own. Yes that is what was proposed, you’re the only one who seems unclear on it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lumony@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 1 point 1 year ago I said the end goal in my top level comment. I didn't go into methodology because I figured someone else could do it more eloquently; thank you for doing so. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lumony@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 1 point 1 year ago I said the end goal in my top level comment. I didn't go into methodology because I figured someone else could do it more eloquently; thank you for doing so. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 1 point 1 year ago I said the end goal in my top level comment. I didn't go into methodology because I figured someone else could do it more eloquently; thank you for doing so. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) It does if it reports the URL to click home somewhere and users can opt in to pull the list to auto click. It would DDoS the ad servers. Muwhahahaa permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes. That’s just what I want. An extension sending all ads served to me to a central location, so my fingerprint can be very easily indexed and stored on a definitely never hacked, leaked, or sold database. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago And it would totally never get abused or hit a false positive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes. That’s just what I want. An extension sending all ads served to me to a central location, so my fingerprint can be very easily indexed and stored on a definitely never hacked, leaked, or sold database. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago And it would totally never get abused or hit a false positive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago And it would totally never get abused or hit a false positive. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago* Totally doable if this was a distributed service. ok not randomly generated, but you know permalink fedilink source parent