▲ 320 ▼ A cartoon by Yuliy Ganf lampooning the US (1953). Sadly now applies to Europe too. (i.postimg.cc) submitted 1 year ago by nuko147@lemm.ee to c/europe@sopuli.xyz 18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Stovetop@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 child) I disagree, we don't have to sacrifice social benefits and public service to divert all the money to the defense. We can tax the rich fairly and get both, a welfare state with strong public service and social security, and a strong army for our defense! Neo-liberals are using the current situation as a new justification for the same shitty policies they are pushing for 3 decades. No change in strategy, just a new excuse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago perhaps they can grow their military while being wise enough to prevent a politically powerful military-industrial complex permalink fedilink source parent [+] nuko147@lemm.ee [S] -7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Necessity maybe yeah, but it didn't end well last time. Also it can be a permanent situation if the economies of France and Germany see development through militarism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 child) ...and we'll have Putin and Trump to blame for it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] misk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* I mean, for people in countries that were prey for French or German militarism this is like saying it doesn’t matter which predator is going to eat your pet hamster. They might lose this game of fascist whack-a-mole eventually - what then? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 child) I disagree, we don't have to sacrifice social benefits and public service to divert all the money to the defense. We can tax the rich fairly and get both, a welfare state with strong public service and social security, and a strong army for our defense! Neo-liberals are using the current situation as a new justification for the same shitty policies they are pushing for 3 decades. No change in strategy, just a new excuse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago perhaps they can grow their military while being wise enough to prevent a politically powerful military-industrial complex permalink fedilink source parent
[+] nuko147@lemm.ee [S] -7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Necessity maybe yeah, but it didn't end well last time. Also it can be a permanent situation if the economies of France and Germany see development through militarism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 child) ...and we'll have Putin and Trump to blame for it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] misk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* I mean, for people in countries that were prey for French or German militarism this is like saying it doesn’t matter which predator is going to eat your pet hamster. They might lose this game of fascist whack-a-mole eventually - what then? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 child) ...and we'll have Putin and Trump to blame for it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] misk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* I mean, for people in countries that were prey for French or German militarism this is like saying it doesn’t matter which predator is going to eat your pet hamster. They might lose this game of fascist whack-a-mole eventually - what then? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* I mean, for people in countries that were prey for French or German militarism this is like saying it doesn’t matter which predator is going to eat your pet hamster. They might lose this game of fascist whack-a-mole eventually - what then? permalink fedilink source parent