you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I disagree, we don't have to sacrifice social benefits and public service to divert all the money to the defense. We can tax the rich fairly and get both, a welfare state with strong public service and social security, and a strong army for our defense!

    Neo-liberals are using the current situation as a new justification for the same shitty policies they are pushing for 3 decades. No change in strategy, just a new excuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Necessity maybe yeah, but it didn't end well last time. Also it can be a permanent situation if the economies of France and Germany see development through militarism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    ...and we'll have Putin and Trump to blame for it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I mean, for people in countries that were prey for French or German militarism this is like saying it doesn’t matter which predator is going to eat your pet hamster. They might lose this game of fascist whack-a-mole eventually - what then?

  • source
  • parent