you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Per Steam page:

AI Generated Content Disclosure The developers describe how their game uses AI Generated Content like this:

Players can generate unique textures for character outfits and various items based on text input. They can also create 3D objects from image input, which can be used as interior decorations or accessories, and add distinctive motions to their Zoi using video input. Additionally, the actions and thoughts of Zois are controlled through sLM technology, enabling more engaging and intuitive interactions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I know Lemmy hates AI in all use cases, but that does sound pretty cool to me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I am opposed to genAI in its current form for a number of personal ethical reasons. I can still admit that it sounds cool, but in its current form I cannot support genAI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well there is the part where all AI is controlled and developed by a group of fashist billionaires that primarily use it to spread false information and further their power, money and influence while destroying democracy, self expression and art. They are developed by stealing, exploiting and destroying the environment.

    It is completely reasonable to hate AI in its current form even when presented with a cool and actually useful use case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I literally said "personal". Yes, that's the definition of a "me problem" and I was open about that.

    I also said I can admit this is a cool use of it also, so I'm not entirely sure what your comment meant to accomplish other than being mean spirited.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In fhe same way you can voice your opinion, someone else can voice why it's flawed, why people should look at a project like this and point out why people should just regurgitate the same old "AI slop" venom. Putting those points forward isn't being mean-spirited, it's highlighting the nuance around a topic and adding more to the conversation than "tis gud"/"tis bad" without being a personal attack so there's no need to go on the defensive either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    I never called it AI slop, and I agree that there's nuance and it is actually that nuance that had led me to my personal conclusion.

    When I say "I personally yadda yadda" and then someone says "that's a you problem," that's not an honest attempt at a conversation. Because I know it's a me thing, I said that already. And they didn't bring up any nuance, or points. They were just trying to "dunk" on me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    OK, what personal, ethical reasons do you have against an algorithm?

    AI is a buzzword. It is not a thing that is smart, sentient, or anything more than a weighted computer model. (More or less).

    So again what is personal or ethical about weighted math?

  • source
  • parent