▲ 23 ▼ Are Linux Phones Ready in 2025? (www.youtube.com) submitted 1 year ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/linux@programming.dev 16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) It is definitely a silent t. They've just misread it. I agree, it's really annoying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) IIRC...Creators say it doesn't matter, either pronunciation is fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago They're being tactful. It's clearly a reference to Waiting for Godot. They even said so. The name "Godot" was chosen in reference to Samuel Beckett's play Waiting for Godot, as it represents the never-ending wish of adding new features in the engine, which would get it closer to an exhaustive product, but never will. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) IIRC...Creators say it doesn't matter, either pronunciation is fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago They're being tactful. It's clearly a reference to Waiting for Godot. They even said so. The name "Godot" was chosen in reference to Samuel Beckett's play Waiting for Godot, as it represents the never-ending wish of adding new features in the engine, which would get it closer to an exhaustive product, but never will. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago They're being tactful. It's clearly a reference to Waiting for Godot. They even said so. The name "Godot" was chosen in reference to Samuel Beckett's play Waiting for Godot, as it represents the never-ending wish of adding new features in the engine, which would get it closer to an exhaustive product, but never will. permalink fedilink source parent