you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Mean this with respect but it's not that simple. Bonobos have matriarchs and when there's a violent abuse like a rape, the female bonobos rip the others genitals off as a show punishment against their actions. Or how elephants care for and mourn their dead. If we were in the wild, our life wouldn't be that of a deer, rabbit or bear, we are a pretty unique species where most of our closely related within our genus are wiped so all we have left is to look at monkeys for simulatry. Be it today or 100,000 years ago, homo sapien was just as smart then as now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In a sense, we are integrated with the previous hominids. They didn’t go extinct so much they bred with early humans and their DNA is preserved in our own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Well yes and no, we did somewhat integrate them, but it in reality it was either we out fucked them leading to them being a tiny part of our DNA, or we did a cheeky genocide. I'm going towards the first idea

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You list other animals as positive examples and then say yourself that our life wouldn't be like other animals.

    When we were still small hunter gatherer groups, individuals who made problems or simply weren't strong enough or a bit sick would cold heartedly be left behind alone which was a death sentence for early humans sooner or later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    This is unequivocally false and we have many examples of deformed individual from 8000+ years ago being not only bruised but cared for until a long age and in many cases decorated. Have you ever considered the possibility that unless absolutely necessary or atleast in most societies, most would care for the weak, sick, deformed, mentally ill. Your mindset of history comes from an hobbsian notion of the rough and brutish hunter gathers which has absolutely no scientfiic base

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/deformed-skull-of-prehistoric-child-suggests-that-early-humans-cared-for-disabled-children

    https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/science/ancient-bones-that-tell-a-story-of-compassion.html

    Also read Dawn of everything and humankind for more sources and more then I could possibly give.

    But simply put. You are incorrect

  • source
  • parent