▲ 232 ▼ Google will move Android AOSP development behind closed doors (9to5google.com) submitted 1 year ago by karpfenkalender@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Atmoro@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago (2 children) PostmarketOS can't happen fast enough LineageOS, & GrapheneOS hopefully will still be good for now permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Senseless@feddit.org 29 points 1 year ago (1 child) As a GrapheneOS user I'm with you on this. Hopefully this won't negatively impact the development of GOS. I feel like it will though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago I wonder how this will affect Ubuntu Touch. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) If google where to close android it'll undoubtedly be forked. Pretty sure the likes of Graphene and Calyx will be fine for the forseeable future. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) and google will be doing everything they can to grow incompatibility and make maintaining an open fork impossible. don't forget that google employs devs for pay, but fork maintainers are doing it as a hobby, out of passion, while already working somewhere. It's a bit similar to matrix, its homeservers and clients. the spec and the software evolves slowly, but its still too fast for alt implementations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Google can only do that if they can maintain grip on the market. This requires the likes of Samsung, who also contribyte to android, to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels. Google closing android would ruffle a lot of feathers so it definitely wouldn't be a given they would come out of that on top. Apple has no problem existing outside of Google's sphere of influence. And honestly if the android market would split and you'd get legitimately google-less phones with large app stores that google doesn't control that would be fairly beneficial if you ask me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) This requires the likes of Samsung to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels. I don't see why samsung wouldn't accept this change. do they make use of the AOSP project? if they do, wouldn't they be able to make a deal with Google to have access to the code? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* I mean. They could go with google and most ideally change nothing, or stay with the open source project and try to cut out a slice of the appstore pie for themselves. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Senseless@feddit.org 29 points 1 year ago (1 child) As a GrapheneOS user I'm with you on this. Hopefully this won't negatively impact the development of GOS. I feel like it will though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago I wonder how this will affect Ubuntu Touch. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago I wonder how this will affect Ubuntu Touch. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) If google where to close android it'll undoubtedly be forked. Pretty sure the likes of Graphene and Calyx will be fine for the forseeable future. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) and google will be doing everything they can to grow incompatibility and make maintaining an open fork impossible. don't forget that google employs devs for pay, but fork maintainers are doing it as a hobby, out of passion, while already working somewhere. It's a bit similar to matrix, its homeservers and clients. the spec and the software evolves slowly, but its still too fast for alt implementations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Google can only do that if they can maintain grip on the market. This requires the likes of Samsung, who also contribyte to android, to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels. Google closing android would ruffle a lot of feathers so it definitely wouldn't be a given they would come out of that on top. Apple has no problem existing outside of Google's sphere of influence. And honestly if the android market would split and you'd get legitimately google-less phones with large app stores that google doesn't control that would be fairly beneficial if you ask me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) This requires the likes of Samsung to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels. I don't see why samsung wouldn't accept this change. do they make use of the AOSP project? if they do, wouldn't they be able to make a deal with Google to have access to the code? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* I mean. They could go with google and most ideally change nothing, or stay with the open source project and try to cut out a slice of the appstore pie for themselves. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) and google will be doing everything they can to grow incompatibility and make maintaining an open fork impossible. don't forget that google employs devs for pay, but fork maintainers are doing it as a hobby, out of passion, while already working somewhere. It's a bit similar to matrix, its homeservers and clients. the spec and the software evolves slowly, but its still too fast for alt implementations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Google can only do that if they can maintain grip on the market. This requires the likes of Samsung, who also contribyte to android, to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels. Google closing android would ruffle a lot of feathers so it definitely wouldn't be a given they would come out of that on top. Apple has no problem existing outside of Google's sphere of influence. And honestly if the android market would split and you'd get legitimately google-less phones with large app stores that google doesn't control that would be fairly beneficial if you ask me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) This requires the likes of Samsung to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels. I don't see why samsung wouldn't accept this change. do they make use of the AOSP project? if they do, wouldn't they be able to make a deal with Google to have access to the code? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* I mean. They could go with google and most ideally change nothing, or stay with the open source project and try to cut out a slice of the appstore pie for themselves. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Google can only do that if they can maintain grip on the market. This requires the likes of Samsung, who also contribyte to android, to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels. Google closing android would ruffle a lot of feathers so it definitely wouldn't be a given they would come out of that on top. Apple has no problem existing outside of Google's sphere of influence. And honestly if the android market would split and you'd get legitimately google-less phones with large app stores that google doesn't control that would be fairly beneficial if you ask me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) This requires the likes of Samsung to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels. I don't see why samsung wouldn't accept this change. do they make use of the AOSP project? if they do, wouldn't they be able to make a deal with Google to have access to the code? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* I mean. They could go with google and most ideally change nothing, or stay with the open source project and try to cut out a slice of the appstore pie for themselves. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) This requires the likes of Samsung to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels. I don't see why samsung wouldn't accept this change. do they make use of the AOSP project? if they do, wouldn't they be able to make a deal with Google to have access to the code? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* I mean. They could go with google and most ideally change nothing, or stay with the open source project and try to cut out a slice of the appstore pie for themselves. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Polderviking@feddit.nl 1 point 1 year ago* I mean. They could go with google and most ideally change nothing, or stay with the open source project and try to cut out a slice of the appstore pie for themselves. permalink fedilink source parent