you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Agreed, not a good thing. Abu Ghraib ring any bells?

See? We can do this all day long but in the end the fact is that these "tactical nukes" weren't used to take out parts of the command structure, but to vaporise not one but two major civilian population centres.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Agreed, not a good thing. Abu Ghraib ring any bells?

    That's not even fucking close.

    but in the end the fact is that these “tactical nukes” weren’t used to take out parts of the command structure,

    Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both chosen for their military and industrial importance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both chosen for their military and industrial importance.

    I could probably say the same for San Fransisco if it was chosen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You absolutely could. San Fran was a major logistics hub during the Second World War.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    And we'd never hear the end of it, yet it's no big deal when done abroad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    yet it’s no big deal when done abroad.

    I see you aren't interested in any serious discussion considering that the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are a major event in the American cultural consciousness and still evoke strong reactions even today.

  • source
  • parent