▲ 1245 ▼ Brian Eno: “The biggest problem about AI is not intrinsic to AI. It’s to do with the fact that it’s owned by the same few people” (musictech.com) submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 140 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] futatorius@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) And a third intrinsic problem is that the current models with infinite training data have been proven to never approach human language capability, from papers written by OpenAI in 2020 and Deepmind in 2022, and also a paper by Stanford which proposes AI simply have no emergent behavior and only convergent behavior. So yeah. Lots of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] andxz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) While I completely agree with you, that is the one thing that could change with just one thing going right for one of all the groups that work on just that problem. It's what happens after that that's really scary, probably. Perhaps we all go into some utopian AI driven future, but I highly doubt that's even possible. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago If gigantic amounts of capital weren't available, then the focus would be on improving the models so they don't need GPU farms running off nuclear reactors plus the sum total of all posts on the Internet ever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) And a third intrinsic problem is that the current models with infinite training data have been proven to never approach human language capability, from papers written by OpenAI in 2020 and Deepmind in 2022, and also a paper by Stanford which proposes AI simply have no emergent behavior and only convergent behavior. So yeah. Lots of problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] andxz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) While I completely agree with you, that is the one thing that could change with just one thing going right for one of all the groups that work on just that problem. It's what happens after that that's really scary, probably. Perhaps we all go into some utopian AI driven future, but I highly doubt that's even possible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] andxz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) While I completely agree with you, that is the one thing that could change with just one thing going right for one of all the groups that work on just that problem. It's what happens after that that's really scary, probably. Perhaps we all go into some utopian AI driven future, but I highly doubt that's even possible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago If gigantic amounts of capital weren't available, then the focus would be on improving the models so they don't need GPU farms running off nuclear reactors plus the sum total of all posts on the Internet ever. permalink fedilink source parent