you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

OK lemmy user "ilovethebomb"

But yes, Kulaks were exploiters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because they had slightly more land than their neighbors? Or a business?

    Cool, cool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Because they intentionally destroyed resources to fight collectivization (ie throwing a tantrum to avoid having to share with people with less than them), which while the process was admittedly mishandled ended up being a good thing in the long run.

    Also I'm not just going to believe a Wikipedia article that anyone with even slightly more than others was labled a Kulak anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    ended up being a good thing in the long run.

    They had a famine and millions died.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments