▲ 1024 ▼ I think my human might be an idiot (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by Facelikeapotato@lemmy.ml to c/cat@lemmy.world 41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 111 points 2 years ago (2 children) OP doesn't know what the word "jargon" means. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 child) Or they’ve only heard jargon from outside their expertise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean. Is the word “jargon” jargon for people who are into linguistics? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) No permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] esadatari@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago and also yes permalink fedilink source parent [–] Facelikeapotato@lemmy.ml [S] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yeah, nonsense would've been a better word. Or word salad, it doesn't get said enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think you were looking for "gibberish." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bebo@sffa.community 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly what I was thinking. "jargon" to be replaced by gibberish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) I had this exact same thought. I think "jargon" in the original post should be "gibberish". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ledtasso@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had precisely the same idea. I suppose "jargon" should have been "gibberish." permalink fedilink source parent [–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Not sure if that's right. To me, it seems like OP meant to say "gibberish" instead of "jargon" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago Wernicke's aphasia. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 child) Or they’ve only heard jargon from outside their expertise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean. Is the word “jargon” jargon for people who are into linguistics? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) No permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] esadatari@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago and also yes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean. Is the word “jargon” jargon for people who are into linguistics? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) No permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] esadatari@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago and also yes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) No permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] esadatari@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago and also yes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Facelikeapotato@lemmy.ml [S] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yeah, nonsense would've been a better word. Or word salad, it doesn't get said enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think you were looking for "gibberish." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bebo@sffa.community 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly what I was thinking. "jargon" to be replaced by gibberish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) I had this exact same thought. I think "jargon" in the original post should be "gibberish". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ledtasso@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had precisely the same idea. I suppose "jargon" should have been "gibberish." permalink fedilink source parent [–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Not sure if that's right. To me, it seems like OP meant to say "gibberish" instead of "jargon" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago Wernicke's aphasia. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think you were looking for "gibberish." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Bebo@sffa.community 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly what I was thinking. "jargon" to be replaced by gibberish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) I had this exact same thought. I think "jargon" in the original post should be "gibberish". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ledtasso@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had precisely the same idea. I suppose "jargon" should have been "gibberish." permalink fedilink source parent [–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Not sure if that's right. To me, it seems like OP meant to say "gibberish" instead of "jargon" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bebo@sffa.community 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly what I was thinking. "jargon" to be replaced by gibberish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) I had this exact same thought. I think "jargon" in the original post should be "gibberish". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ledtasso@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had precisely the same idea. I suppose "jargon" should have been "gibberish." permalink fedilink source parent [–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Not sure if that's right. To me, it seems like OP meant to say "gibberish" instead of "jargon" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) I had this exact same thought. I think "jargon" in the original post should be "gibberish". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ledtasso@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had precisely the same idea. I suppose "jargon" should have been "gibberish." permalink fedilink source parent [–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Not sure if that's right. To me, it seems like OP meant to say "gibberish" instead of "jargon" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ledtasso@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I had precisely the same idea. I suppose "jargon" should have been "gibberish." permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Not sure if that's right. To me, it seems like OP meant to say "gibberish" instead of "jargon" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago Wernicke's aphasia. permalink fedilink source parent