▲ 413 ▼ “Climate-friendly” beef could land in a meat aisle near you. Don’t fall for it. (www.vox.com) submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world [M] to c/news@lemmy.world 120 comments fedilink hide all child comments Tyson Foods and the federal government refuse to show their math for a new sustainability label.
[–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I bet WWF cant wait to put its label on the packaging. They want you to think killing tuna is good for the environment "This product helps protect coastlines and waterways." How is this legal? permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) What's it say? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) This product contributes to the PROTECTION OF COASTS AND WATERS by: Use of feed from sustainable production Refrain from preventive treatment with antibiotics More space per animal Non-genetically modified feed Avoidance of synthetic dyes in feed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Slackhare@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago How does that say "killing tuna is good for the environment"? Isn't it kinda obvious it's a comparison to other tuna? Best for the environment would be to kill yourself and not eat anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 2 years ago* That's quite a wild difference from claiming killing tuna saves the environment. This is saying they only use farmed tuna from sustainable sources, instead of just fishing them from the wild and reducing native populations, as well as not using drugs, GMOs, or synthetic dyes with those farmed fish. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) What's it say? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) This product contributes to the PROTECTION OF COASTS AND WATERS by: Use of feed from sustainable production Refrain from preventive treatment with antibiotics More space per animal Non-genetically modified feed Avoidance of synthetic dyes in feed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Slackhare@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago How does that say "killing tuna is good for the environment"? Isn't it kinda obvious it's a comparison to other tuna? Best for the environment would be to kill yourself and not eat anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 2 years ago* That's quite a wild difference from claiming killing tuna saves the environment. This is saying they only use farmed tuna from sustainable sources, instead of just fishing them from the wild and reducing native populations, as well as not using drugs, GMOs, or synthetic dyes with those farmed fish. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) This product contributes to the PROTECTION OF COASTS AND WATERS by: Use of feed from sustainable production Refrain from preventive treatment with antibiotics More space per animal Non-genetically modified feed Avoidance of synthetic dyes in feed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Slackhare@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago How does that say "killing tuna is good for the environment"? Isn't it kinda obvious it's a comparison to other tuna? Best for the environment would be to kill yourself and not eat anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 2 years ago* That's quite a wild difference from claiming killing tuna saves the environment. This is saying they only use farmed tuna from sustainable sources, instead of just fishing them from the wild and reducing native populations, as well as not using drugs, GMOs, or synthetic dyes with those farmed fish. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Slackhare@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago How does that say "killing tuna is good for the environment"? Isn't it kinda obvious it's a comparison to other tuna? Best for the environment would be to kill yourself and not eat anything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 2 years ago* That's quite a wild difference from claiming killing tuna saves the environment. This is saying they only use farmed tuna from sustainable sources, instead of just fishing them from the wild and reducing native populations, as well as not using drugs, GMOs, or synthetic dyes with those farmed fish. permalink fedilink source parent
