350
ChatGPT is losing some of its hype, as traffic falls for the third month in a row (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

ChatGPT is losing some of its hype, as traffic falls for the third month in a row::August marked the third month in a row that the number of monthly visits to ChatGPT's website worldwide was down, per data from Similarweb.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

"I can suggest an equation that has been a while to get the money to buy a new one for you to be a part of the wave of the day I will be there for you"

There, my phone keyboard "hallucinated" this by suggesting the next word.

I understand that anthropomorphising is fun, but it gives the statistical engines more hype than they deserve.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Your phone keyboard statistical engine is not a very insightful comparison to the neural networks that power LLMs. They're not the same technology at all and just share the barest minimum superficial similarities.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ah "neural networks" with no neurons?

    I'm not comparing technologies, I'm saying those are not "hallucinations", the engines don't "think" and they don't "get something wrong".

    The output is dependent on the input, statistically calculated and presented to the user.

    A parrot is, in the most literal of ways, smarter than the "Artificial intelligence" sentence generators we have now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    because they are being wilfully obtuse suggesting that "neural network" a term going back over half a century for a computatuonal method doesnt apply to things without biological neurons, and doing the same thing applying an overly narrow deffinition of halucination when it has a clear meaning in this context of stating textually probable but incorrect statements.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •