I'm reconsidering my terminal emulator and was curious what everyone was using.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

So, just to check I understood:

  • "[Tiling] Window Managers" are a very specific tool.
  • "Desktop Environments" are broader tools that (may?) contain Window Managers.

Now... the next questions (if you have the patience :P) are:

  • is is possible to use a Window Manager without a Desktop Environment?
  • how does this influence your choose for the terminal emulator? Ó_ò

Thanks for the answers!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    • Yes, you can absolutely use a WM without a DE. A DE is usually just a set of preconfigured and pre-installed applications. If you use a WM like i3 etc. you just get something that draws windows, and no settings and bluetooth applications
    • It influences my choosing because window managers usually don't come with a terminal, and you have to manually install a terminal emulator. But on desktop environments I use the default terminal, although I could also install kitty.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Oooh... I see. I didn't understand how broad the Desktop Env really are. Is not that they manage "a lot of things regarding the desktop and windows"... is just like a bundle of apps.

    Now it's starting to sound like a sub-distro inside the distros, but I think this is a good point to stop bothering you. Thanks again!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    For most people, a different desktop environment probably makes a bigger difference than a different distro. They won't notice things like a different package manager

  • source
  • parent