This is a rant about how so many apps on many different platforms (TVs, mobile devices, computers, etc...) have decided to not actually show detailed errors any more. Instead, we get something along the lines of:

Oops, somehting went wrong. Please try again later

.... and then, well, we get to figure out what just happened and what in the world we need to do about it. And good luck with that, since you have no idea what just failed.

Why software developers?!? Why have you forsaken us?

EDIT 24 hours later: I feel like I need to clarify a few things:

I've worked for 8 software companies over 30+ years. I know why putting a DB error into the message users see is a bad idea. I know that makes me uncommon, but I still want more info from these messages.

You all are answering as if there are only two ways this can work: (a) what we have now (which is useless), and (b) a detailed error listing showing a full stack trace. I think the developers could meet me half-way.

What I want is either (a) "Something went wrong on the server, you can't fix it, but we will" or (b) "Something on your end didn't work. Check your network or restart the app or do something differently and then try the same thing again". And if they're blocking me because I'm using a VPN, fucking say so (but that's a whole separate thing...)

Some apps do provide enough info so I have a clue what I should do next, and I appreciate the effort they put into helping me. I think what I am really ranting about is I want more developers to take the time to do this instead of reporting all errors with "Oops, try again". (If the error is in their server, why should I try again?) Give me a hint as to the problem, so I have something to go on.

Cheers y'all. Still love you my techy brothers and sisters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 67 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Because 99% of the time these errors are caused by something on their end that the user is unable to fix, even on the off chance that they understand the problem in the first place. So there isn't any need to give you more information than "something went wrong, please wait a minute and/or try again".

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    OK but then inherent in what you're saying is also the message, "... and don't contact us about this, because we don't want to deal with it" which is also mildly infuriating to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Iit’s an internal error that is not handled properly. They don’t want to tell you the exact error message and detailed information around that, because it would expose the internal state of the backend and that would be a security issue. There is really nothing more that they can tell you, except that a developer needs to look at this (and possibly thousands to tens or hundreds of thousands of similar logged errors) and they probably already are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe then, the message could be, "An internal error has occurred and we're going to work on fixing it but there's nothing you can do to fix it yourself right now". It's the "Oops" that fries my grits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    LMFAO. I probably have to truncate at least five error log files a week on various vps servers at my company because they fill the SSD and crash the OS. We rent servers we don't dev them for our cx.

    Largest error file I've seen so far is 32 GB

    Site owners are normally clueless. Site developers normally can't give a single fuck and systems administrators like me. Get to pick up the pieces and tell them to tell their Deb to fix it and then we pick it up again and tell them to tell their Dev to fix it let me know when you sense a pattern

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Are you not rotating your logs with for example logrotate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    To reiterate, they are not my logs. It's not my server. It's a server that the customer is renting and not maintaining and we're not going to purge their data unless they ask not all logs rotate. Mostly error_log files in garbage wp sites

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    So literally just found somebody's exim main log archive.gz that was 12 GB and this is an archive from 2023. I have no idea why it even exists on this mans server still and was not reclaimed with the rest of its older brothers. I'm guessing failed cron idk ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're assuming they aren't already aware of the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sorry but how does that help me?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    What I'm saying is that when you see one of these messages you should interpret it as "something is wrong on our end, nothing you can or need to do on your end, please hang tight as we're aware of the issue and working on it". They don't give you more info than that because that average person is probably not a dev and doesn't have any need for more details than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    You're giving an incredibly large allowance for companies that have continuously calculated exactly how much they can fuck over their customers for more money before we decide to use some other product.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How does telling someone about a problem they're already aware of help you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    When you're in a restaurant and your server accidentally dumps the entire tray of food in your lap, would you prefer them to apologize or just stare at you because you already know what the problem is. Clearly you requested food to be delivered to your table and it didn't make it there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Of course if their servers and whatnot are shit they won't straight up tell you they are shit.

    It's why modern multiplayer games don't even show everyone's latency anymore. It would let players know imperically that their servers are shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • In theory, maybe. In practice, I've had a lot of errors in that vein that very much wouldn't go away, and where made much harder to diagnose by their obtuseness.

    Honestly, I even dislike the mindset. Just make a big header with the generic error message and a little one below that gives some details. Having users interested in how your software works is not a bad thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Blanket "99%" statements are unfounded. I have had countless issues I was able to fix through error messages and some without.

    Source your claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I can’t speak for the other user’s claim, but I’ve worked at Facebook, Google, and LinkedIn, and have written plenty of error messages. When I write a message like these, it’s specifically because the user can’t do anything about it. I’ll log the error to our internal error tracking systems with actual information about it, then give the user a generic message.

    If it’s something the user did wrong, and they can fix it, I’ll absolutely give them a message saying that. Usually I won’t even let a user submit a bad request, but sometimes users will bypass frontend restrictions to submit it, so the server always needs to validate it again anyway. The fact that plenty of users won’t even read the message I write is kind of annoying, but at least the users who do read it will know how to fix it.

    I’ve tried sending detailed error messages before, and that invariably results in users submitting support tickets and forum posts for things that aren’t helpful. You learn pretty quickly what kind of messages are helpful and what kind aren’t.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I would appreciate the detailed error responses even if the developers don't think it would be of use to them.

    When a project has unexpected downtime, and they do a postmortem explaining exactly what part of their infrastructure failed, what steps they took to resolve it, and how they will prevent it in the future, that is great.

    I appreciate transparency. Of course, to expect this from a large corporations is expecting a pig to fly, but detailed error messages are one more step away from "We are the cloud" and one step towards "We are real people providing a service which operates on server infrastructure consisting of..." Its transparent, down-to-earth, and respects people who do want to see behind the scenes.

    One company I used even had a white paper explaining their infrastructure as a whole.

    This all may not make you more money, but I prefer this to instead treating me with the bare minimum insight into the inner-workings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I want you to really pay attention to the last paragraph of my previous comment. It’s the most important part. You might like having more information that doesn’t help you, but that comes at the cost of thousands of useless tasks and posts that all have to be manually closed. It’s not only not helpful to give the user detailed error messages in a lot of cases, it’s actively harmful to a business. It doesn’t make any business sense to tell a user that a cache layer host or a db shard is down. As a developer of these kinds of systems, I’m not going to give extra information that you don’t need just to make a few users happy that they get a peek under the hood if it means hurting our support staff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    How is a user sending a support request containing the information: "Site not working. Error message: A surge in requests is overloading the server. Everyone is being ratelimited." Any different from them just saying "Site not working."?

    If they were going to submit an issue for a problem that is already known, why would the error message significantly change the difficulty of dealing them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Because if there’s no error code or specific message, they’re far less likely to submit a ticket. The reason these messages often say, “try again later” is because that is the appropriate action for the user to take.

  • source
  • parent