The paper does what all transphobes, and coincidentally most sexists, do when this subject comes up:

Pretends that the average woman has a shot at high level athletics even at just the college level.

If there's scholarships on the line, the people getting them are going to have certain natural advantages on top of busting their asses for years at the sport.

To quote an old Utah Jazz coach:

You can't coach height

So when you compare the average 22 year old woman to an elite college athlete, you're gonna a very large gap. Just like comparing an average 22 year old guy to whoever just won the Heisman trophy.

The difference is larger in women. Because the average guy is more likely to have played sports growing up, and those gains in coordination when you g last for life.

And that's not even it.

There are just soooooooooo many reasons why this who thing is overblown fearmongering designed to get idiots mad at a very small very vulnerable group.

Of all the things to be mad about right now, your mad at tops, absolutely tops, double digit young non-paid athletes.

Just fucking why?

If it's not transphobia, what other reason do you care to still be going thru this thread desperately trying to have the same argument?