you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

There are no significant advantages to a "male puberty" that are not countered by HRT.

Uh... Palm size? Heart and lung size? Height? Don't get me wrong I recognize this for the culture war bullshit it is, but there is some truth to this that needs to be addressed.

Edit: I only read the conclusion (and wouldn't be able to tell if the methodology is flawed anyway) but I found this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So shouldn't we eliminate all players who may have physical advantages? What about a woman from birth who grows to 6'5"? Seems like that'd be an unfair advantage when playing against other women who may be only 5'10".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean by your logic we should just eliminate women's leagues entirely and make everything coed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That's not my logic, that's your logic. Some people are born with genetic traits that make them good at certain sports, and that's always been the case. Your argument is that it's unfair if people have advantages and should be banned, so why not take it all the way instead of nitpicking here and there?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because that's stupid? Why SHOULD we "take it all the way"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments