The IRS rules governing nonprofits still required the Mozilla Foundation to beg big to go big: the parent had to go find big grants from Soros, Ford, Knight, MacArthur, and give smaller grants to many. This put it in the lefties-only-no-righty-Irish-need-apply revolving-door personnel sector of NGOs and nonprofits (too many glowies there for me, too). Which meant I had a hostile MoFo over my head the minute I got CEO appointment from the MoCo board...

Of course I can't comment on anything about my exit, for reasons that only the most loopy HN h8ers still can't figure out.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43251203

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Always has been. I considered anyone who used it slightly sus until further proof. And if they basically advertised it, I considered them too far gone to try anything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    99% of people don't care about the things that you care about, and use the products they enjoy using. Classifying people by the web browser they use is crazy talk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    When it's owned and operated by a literal open bigot and the fact it only became popular after the bigot was removed from his office chair because of it, I have every reason to question why someone uses a browser that promotes crypto, and steals from the content creators it said it funds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments