▲ 877 ▼ Me after Mozilla and Proton (i.imgflip.com) submitted 1 year ago by RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to c/memes@lemmy.world 120 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Cool. Could you elaborate? Because I only do this because of some kind of gut feeling... 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gamer@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Flatpaks are containerized, making them both more reliable and more secure (in general... but it's always possible to fuck things up). Besides the benefits to users, there are also huge benefits to developers: they can publish a single package and support nearly every distro with it. It's often impossible for a dev to publish and maintain packages for all Linux distros out there, so stuff on AUR is built and packaged by well-meaning, but random people who are not the original developer. This very often leads to the app having bugs and compatibility issues which the developer ends up wasting time debugging and trying to fix even though it's not their fault. (although downstream packagers can fuck this up too by publishing their own unofficial Flatpaks, like Fedora's recent OBS shenanigans) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Oh yeah, the OBS thing. Yeah, I guess these are the reasons I've felt like Flatpaks are a bit more stable than AUR packages. They might take up more space or whatever, but it's nice to know they work like they're supposed to, especially commercial stuff like Spotify and Slack etc. I just wish Flatpak software integrated better with the rest of the system without extra configuration. permalink fedilink source parent [–] far_university190@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Firefox flatpak less secure because namespace not available in flatpak: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756236 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Flatpaks are containerized, making them both more reliable and more secure (in general... but it's always possible to fuck things up). Besides the benefits to users, there are also huge benefits to developers: they can publish a single package and support nearly every distro with it. It's often impossible for a dev to publish and maintain packages for all Linux distros out there, so stuff on AUR is built and packaged by well-meaning, but random people who are not the original developer. This very often leads to the app having bugs and compatibility issues which the developer ends up wasting time debugging and trying to fix even though it's not their fault. (although downstream packagers can fuck this up too by publishing their own unofficial Flatpaks, like Fedora's recent OBS shenanigans) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Oh yeah, the OBS thing. Yeah, I guess these are the reasons I've felt like Flatpaks are a bit more stable than AUR packages. They might take up more space or whatever, but it's nice to know they work like they're supposed to, especially commercial stuff like Spotify and Slack etc. I just wish Flatpak software integrated better with the rest of the system without extra configuration. permalink fedilink source parent [–] far_university190@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Firefox flatpak less secure because namespace not available in flatpak: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756236 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Oh yeah, the OBS thing. Yeah, I guess these are the reasons I've felt like Flatpaks are a bit more stable than AUR packages. They might take up more space or whatever, but it's nice to know they work like they're supposed to, especially commercial stuff like Spotify and Slack etc. I just wish Flatpak software integrated better with the rest of the system without extra configuration. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] far_university190@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Firefox flatpak less secure because namespace not available in flatpak: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756236 permalink fedilink source parent