▲ 166 ▼ AI-generated child sex imagery has every US attorney general calling for action (arstechnica.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 72 comments fedilink hide all child comments AI-generated child sex imagery has every US attorney general calling for action::"A race against time to protect the children of our country from the dangers of AI."
[+] ram@lemmy.ca -10 points 2 years ago (2 children) Psychologists. There's no evidence that CSAM, real or virtual, helps reduce rates of child predation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Falmarri@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ram@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago (it’s not) I'd love if you could cite your evidence. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I assume it increases it then since you're so opposed to it I’d love if you could cite your evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ram@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I never said I had evidence. I specifically said there was no evidence. The claim presented is that it's beneficial, and thte burden of proof lies with the claim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) And what if CG porn is that help That's not claiming it is benefical. It's entertaining the idea that what if it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ram@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then that can be decided by psychologists. It's funny you keep insisting on calling it "CG porn" though when it's abjectly and legally child pornography. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago I have not once called it CG porn. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Falmarri@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ram@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago (it’s not) I'd love if you could cite your evidence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ram@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago (it’s not) I'd love if you could cite your evidence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I assume it increases it then since you're so opposed to it I’d love if you could cite your evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ram@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I never said I had evidence. I specifically said there was no evidence. The claim presented is that it's beneficial, and thte burden of proof lies with the claim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) And what if CG porn is that help That's not claiming it is benefical. It's entertaining the idea that what if it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ram@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then that can be decided by psychologists. It's funny you keep insisting on calling it "CG porn" though when it's abjectly and legally child pornography. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago I have not once called it CG porn. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ram@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I never said I had evidence. I specifically said there was no evidence. The claim presented is that it's beneficial, and thte burden of proof lies with the claim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) And what if CG porn is that help That's not claiming it is benefical. It's entertaining the idea that what if it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ram@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then that can be decided by psychologists. It's funny you keep insisting on calling it "CG porn" though when it's abjectly and legally child pornography. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago I have not once called it CG porn. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) And what if CG porn is that help That's not claiming it is benefical. It's entertaining the idea that what if it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ram@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then that can be decided by psychologists. It's funny you keep insisting on calling it "CG porn" though when it's abjectly and legally child pornography. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago I have not once called it CG porn. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ram@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then that can be decided by psychologists. It's funny you keep insisting on calling it "CG porn" though when it's abjectly and legally child pornography. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago I have not once called it CG porn. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago I have not once called it CG porn. permalink fedilink source parent