▲ 1021 ▼ "A woman is like a child": MAGA quickly turns its sights on stripping Republican women of power (www.salon.com) submitted 1 year ago* by CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world 265 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 68 points 1 year ago (2 children) Look at how Teheran women were dressed in the 70s, and contrast that to how they're dressed now. The same future awaits American women. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 child) Handmaids Tale, anyone? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 year ago (1 child) Margaret Atwood is rolling in her... checks google... Well-appointed Canadian home. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm sure she's just going "I literally warned all of you, and the government is using it as an instruction book." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago This never gets old. Unfortunately this never gets old. permalink fedilink source parent [+] elucubra@sopuli.xyz -66 points 1 year ago* (5 children) Yeah, no. US society is nothing like islamic societies. A faction if the rabid right thinks like this, and the rest of the right may agree to an extent, but they are aware that they can't sell that to the majority. Plus, too many women jusdges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 child) All it takes is heavy propaganda that exaggerates the upsides and downplays the downsides, while shutting down dissidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago And they will still hate Muslims (and label all of them insane radicals) for Islam's views on women. Even though Islamic views on women are actually better than what Christian nationalists believe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago ''Everyone is too reasonable for this to happen, despite the fact that the people in charge of every branch of government have repeatedly made it clear this is what they want to do'' Yes, most people are against this. Also most people are pro choice, or at the very least pro choice in cases of medical necessity, rape or incest, and most people are against laws specifically designed to ethnically clense the US of Hispanic people entirely, or laws that prevent children from accessing modem healthcare, or an unelected billionaire acting as though he's the president. Most people being against something doesn't mean they won't do everything to make it happen. This has been in the works for the federalist society and so called family values groups and fundamentalist Christian nationalists for my entire life, this isn't an accident that is happening now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 child) oh to be so naive again... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -25 points 1 year ago (2 children) You being pessimistic does not make you wise. It does, apparently, make you condescending. But not wise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 child) And you saying "yeah, no" doesn't constitute a rebuttal. There's nothing in the Qur'an that isn't in the Bible vis-à-vis the treatment of women. The only difference between Islamic societies is that they've convinced more people to take it literally, and it absolutely can happen in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -7 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I didn't say yeah no I said the person I responded to was being rude to the person they responded to It's possible to disagree on a subject without implying the person you disagree with is a dumb child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) But what if they are a woman...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago I apologise. It was elucubra who said "yeah no" and not you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -5 points 1 year ago I do not get any better or worse sleep by telling you you're rude. You may be under the delusion you are responding to someone else. permalink fedilink source parent [+] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago Oh please. What part of what's happening now makes you think they give a damn what the rest of us think? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 child) Handmaids Tale, anyone? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 year ago (1 child) Margaret Atwood is rolling in her... checks google... Well-appointed Canadian home. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm sure she's just going "I literally warned all of you, and the government is using it as an instruction book." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago This never gets old. Unfortunately this never gets old. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 year ago (1 child) Margaret Atwood is rolling in her... checks google... Well-appointed Canadian home. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm sure she's just going "I literally warned all of you, and the government is using it as an instruction book." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago This never gets old. Unfortunately this never gets old. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm sure she's just going "I literally warned all of you, and the government is using it as an instruction book." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago This never gets old. Unfortunately this never gets old. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago This never gets old. Unfortunately this never gets old. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago This never gets old. Unfortunately this never gets old. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] elucubra@sopuli.xyz -66 points 1 year ago* (5 children) Yeah, no. US society is nothing like islamic societies. A faction if the rabid right thinks like this, and the rest of the right may agree to an extent, but they are aware that they can't sell that to the majority. Plus, too many women jusdges. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 child) All it takes is heavy propaganda that exaggerates the upsides and downplays the downsides, while shutting down dissidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago And they will still hate Muslims (and label all of them insane radicals) for Islam's views on women. Even though Islamic views on women are actually better than what Christian nationalists believe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago ''Everyone is too reasonable for this to happen, despite the fact that the people in charge of every branch of government have repeatedly made it clear this is what they want to do'' Yes, most people are against this. Also most people are pro choice, or at the very least pro choice in cases of medical necessity, rape or incest, and most people are against laws specifically designed to ethnically clense the US of Hispanic people entirely, or laws that prevent children from accessing modem healthcare, or an unelected billionaire acting as though he's the president. Most people being against something doesn't mean they won't do everything to make it happen. This has been in the works for the federalist society and so called family values groups and fundamentalist Christian nationalists for my entire life, this isn't an accident that is happening now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 child) oh to be so naive again... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -25 points 1 year ago (2 children) You being pessimistic does not make you wise. It does, apparently, make you condescending. But not wise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 child) And you saying "yeah, no" doesn't constitute a rebuttal. There's nothing in the Qur'an that isn't in the Bible vis-à-vis the treatment of women. The only difference between Islamic societies is that they've convinced more people to take it literally, and it absolutely can happen in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -7 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I didn't say yeah no I said the person I responded to was being rude to the person they responded to It's possible to disagree on a subject without implying the person you disagree with is a dumb child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) But what if they are a woman...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago I apologise. It was elucubra who said "yeah no" and not you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -5 points 1 year ago I do not get any better or worse sleep by telling you you're rude. You may be under the delusion you are responding to someone else. permalink fedilink source parent [+] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago Oh please. What part of what's happening now makes you think they give a damn what the rest of us think? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 child) All it takes is heavy propaganda that exaggerates the upsides and downplays the downsides, while shutting down dissidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago And they will still hate Muslims (and label all of them insane radicals) for Islam's views on women. Even though Islamic views on women are actually better than what Christian nationalists believe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago And they will still hate Muslims (and label all of them insane radicals) for Islam's views on women. Even though Islamic views on women are actually better than what Christian nationalists believe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago ''Everyone is too reasonable for this to happen, despite the fact that the people in charge of every branch of government have repeatedly made it clear this is what they want to do'' Yes, most people are against this. Also most people are pro choice, or at the very least pro choice in cases of medical necessity, rape or incest, and most people are against laws specifically designed to ethnically clense the US of Hispanic people entirely, or laws that prevent children from accessing modem healthcare, or an unelected billionaire acting as though he's the president. Most people being against something doesn't mean they won't do everything to make it happen. This has been in the works for the federalist society and so called family values groups and fundamentalist Christian nationalists for my entire life, this isn't an accident that is happening now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 child) oh to be so naive again... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -25 points 1 year ago (2 children) You being pessimistic does not make you wise. It does, apparently, make you condescending. But not wise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 child) And you saying "yeah, no" doesn't constitute a rebuttal. There's nothing in the Qur'an that isn't in the Bible vis-à-vis the treatment of women. The only difference between Islamic societies is that they've convinced more people to take it literally, and it absolutely can happen in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -7 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I didn't say yeah no I said the person I responded to was being rude to the person they responded to It's possible to disagree on a subject without implying the person you disagree with is a dumb child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) But what if they are a woman...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago I apologise. It was elucubra who said "yeah no" and not you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -5 points 1 year ago I do not get any better or worse sleep by telling you you're rude. You may be under the delusion you are responding to someone else. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -25 points 1 year ago (2 children) You being pessimistic does not make you wise. It does, apparently, make you condescending. But not wise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 child) And you saying "yeah, no" doesn't constitute a rebuttal. There's nothing in the Qur'an that isn't in the Bible vis-à-vis the treatment of women. The only difference between Islamic societies is that they've convinced more people to take it literally, and it absolutely can happen in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -7 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I didn't say yeah no I said the person I responded to was being rude to the person they responded to It's possible to disagree on a subject without implying the person you disagree with is a dumb child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) But what if they are a woman...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago I apologise. It was elucubra who said "yeah no" and not you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -5 points 1 year ago I do not get any better or worse sleep by telling you you're rude. You may be under the delusion you are responding to someone else. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 child) And you saying "yeah, no" doesn't constitute a rebuttal. There's nothing in the Qur'an that isn't in the Bible vis-à-vis the treatment of women. The only difference between Islamic societies is that they've convinced more people to take it literally, and it absolutely can happen in the US. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -7 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I didn't say yeah no I said the person I responded to was being rude to the person they responded to It's possible to disagree on a subject without implying the person you disagree with is a dumb child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) But what if they are a woman...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago I apologise. It was elucubra who said "yeah no" and not you. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -7 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I didn't say yeah no I said the person I responded to was being rude to the person they responded to It's possible to disagree on a subject without implying the person you disagree with is a dumb child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) But what if they are a woman...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago :( permalink fedilink source parent [–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago I apologise. It was elucubra who said "yeah no" and not you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) But what if they are a woman...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago :( permalink fedilink source parent
[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago I apologise. It was elucubra who said "yeah no" and not you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -5 points 1 year ago I do not get any better or worse sleep by telling you you're rude. You may be under the delusion you are responding to someone else. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -5 points 1 year ago I do not get any better or worse sleep by telling you you're rude. You may be under the delusion you are responding to someone else. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago Oh please. What part of what's happening now makes you think they give a damn what the rest of us think? permalink fedilink source parent