you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Only if the appointees are bad (which, since it's Trump and "stuff up the deep state" project 2025, there's probably a lot of bad appointees). If we obstruct appointees that are good, we'll just keep seeing the pendulum swinging when a new party comes into power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't believe you're making that argument in good faith. Every one of his nominees have been ridiculous caricatures of stereotypical MAGA car salesman

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    None of Trump's appointees are good. If they were, they would refuse to serve under him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Appointed federal judges do not have obligations to Trump and may strike down his orders.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Sure bud. It's not like they didn't block Biden's stuff and rubber stamped Trump's stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I do not think that is enough reasoning for claiming they're incompetent for blocking their nominations. The Supreme Court has 2 or 3 problem justices, yes, but just look at the plethora of court cases against Trump with injunctions right now. Quite a bit of them were speedily decided under Trump appointees.

  • source
  • parent