▲ 1034 ▼ Calls to tax the superrich grow as economic inequality surges (www.aljazeera.com) submitted 2 years ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/world@lemmy.world 97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because the people benefiting from its brokenness aren't ready to stop salting the earth for numbers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) ...I think you may have misread my comment. I'm saying it's broken and asking why it should be accepted as infallible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) I thought they were just agreeing with you, FWIW permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago You're right - but I can see how the tone was interpreted as oppositional, I could have worded it differently to direct that more clearly. No harm afaik, lol. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) ...I think you may have misread my comment. I'm saying it's broken and asking why it should be accepted as infallible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) I thought they were just agreeing with you, FWIW permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago You're right - but I can see how the tone was interpreted as oppositional, I could have worded it differently to direct that more clearly. No harm afaik, lol. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) I thought they were just agreeing with you, FWIW permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago You're right - but I can see how the tone was interpreted as oppositional, I could have worded it differently to direct that more clearly. No harm afaik, lol. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago You're right - but I can see how the tone was interpreted as oppositional, I could have worded it differently to direct that more clearly. No harm afaik, lol. permalink fedilink source parent