▲ 818 ▼ Valve ban advertising-based business models on Steam, no forced adverts like in mobile games (www.gamingonlinux.com) submitted 2 years ago by RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to c/steam@lemmy.ml 64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Abrinoxus@lemmy.today 174 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lets all pray they stay out of the stockmarket permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 77 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] einkorn@feddit.org 35 points 2 years ago (2 children) Valve is a private company, so depending on who owns a majority of the shares, not much might change after Gabens earthly demise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Private investors are (usually, and theoretically) more "long-term" motivated than the public markets. Day traders and rotating board members love quarterly boosts even if it implodes the company, but with private equity, passing a bag of shit to someone else isn’t so easy, and desires aren’t so fickle. Hence I suspect you're right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Can you give same examples of such privately owned companies which are long term focussed? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) It’s wild to me how few people understand that private companies have shareholders too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] einkorn@feddit.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I am not sure how to interpret your response. Do you mean I do not know that Valve as a private company does have shareholders? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Redredme@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago What he means is, when gaben our lord an saviour dies, his majority shares ownership will be transferred to his inheritors. The question "do they want to own and do they understand Valve or just see a big pile of cash?" will be answered then and there. Which can very well result in an IPO. permalink fedilink source parent [–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Aren't they called investors when it's private? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Same thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) My understanding was that a large percentage of Valve is employee owned. Would love to know if that's true or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) That just means that buying it spreads the money to slightly more people. They're practically just as easy to acquire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago It also means that more people have to be willing to sell (or that if only a few sell, investors hold less power) permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 77 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] einkorn@feddit.org 35 points 2 years ago (2 children) Valve is a private company, so depending on who owns a majority of the shares, not much might change after Gabens earthly demise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Private investors are (usually, and theoretically) more "long-term" motivated than the public markets. Day traders and rotating board members love quarterly boosts even if it implodes the company, but with private equity, passing a bag of shit to someone else isn’t so easy, and desires aren’t so fickle. Hence I suspect you're right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Can you give same examples of such privately owned companies which are long term focussed? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) It’s wild to me how few people understand that private companies have shareholders too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] einkorn@feddit.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I am not sure how to interpret your response. Do you mean I do not know that Valve as a private company does have shareholders? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Redredme@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago What he means is, when gaben our lord an saviour dies, his majority shares ownership will be transferred to his inheritors. The question "do they want to own and do they understand Valve or just see a big pile of cash?" will be answered then and there. Which can very well result in an IPO. permalink fedilink source parent [–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Aren't they called investors when it's private? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Same thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) My understanding was that a large percentage of Valve is employee owned. Would love to know if that's true or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) That just means that buying it spreads the money to slightly more people. They're practically just as easy to acquire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago It also means that more people have to be willing to sell (or that if only a few sell, investors hold less power) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 35 points 2 years ago (2 children) Valve is a private company, so depending on who owns a majority of the shares, not much might change after Gabens earthly demise. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Private investors are (usually, and theoretically) more "long-term" motivated than the public markets. Day traders and rotating board members love quarterly boosts even if it implodes the company, but with private equity, passing a bag of shit to someone else isn’t so easy, and desires aren’t so fickle. Hence I suspect you're right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Can you give same examples of such privately owned companies which are long term focussed? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) It’s wild to me how few people understand that private companies have shareholders too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] einkorn@feddit.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I am not sure how to interpret your response. Do you mean I do not know that Valve as a private company does have shareholders? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Redredme@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago What he means is, when gaben our lord an saviour dies, his majority shares ownership will be transferred to his inheritors. The question "do they want to own and do they understand Valve or just see a big pile of cash?" will be answered then and there. Which can very well result in an IPO. permalink fedilink source parent [–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Aren't they called investors when it's private? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Same thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Private investors are (usually, and theoretically) more "long-term" motivated than the public markets. Day traders and rotating board members love quarterly boosts even if it implodes the company, but with private equity, passing a bag of shit to someone else isn’t so easy, and desires aren’t so fickle. Hence I suspect you're right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Can you give same examples of such privately owned companies which are long term focussed? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago Can you give same examples of such privately owned companies which are long term focussed? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) It’s wild to me how few people understand that private companies have shareholders too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] einkorn@feddit.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I am not sure how to interpret your response. Do you mean I do not know that Valve as a private company does have shareholders? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Redredme@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago What he means is, when gaben our lord an saviour dies, his majority shares ownership will be transferred to his inheritors. The question "do they want to own and do they understand Valve or just see a big pile of cash?" will be answered then and there. Which can very well result in an IPO. permalink fedilink source parent [–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Aren't they called investors when it's private? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Same thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) I am not sure how to interpret your response. Do you mean I do not know that Valve as a private company does have shareholders? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Redredme@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago What he means is, when gaben our lord an saviour dies, his majority shares ownership will be transferred to his inheritors. The question "do they want to own and do they understand Valve or just see a big pile of cash?" will be answered then and there. Which can very well result in an IPO. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago What he means is, when gaben our lord an saviour dies, his majority shares ownership will be transferred to his inheritors. The question "do they want to own and do they understand Valve or just see a big pile of cash?" will be answered then and there. Which can very well result in an IPO. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Aren't they called investors when it's private? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 years ago Same thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) My understanding was that a large percentage of Valve is employee owned. Would love to know if that's true or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) That just means that buying it spreads the money to slightly more people. They're practically just as easy to acquire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago It also means that more people have to be willing to sell (or that if only a few sell, investors hold less power) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) That just means that buying it spreads the money to slightly more people. They're practically just as easy to acquire. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago It also means that more people have to be willing to sell (or that if only a few sell, investors hold less power) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago It also means that more people have to be willing to sell (or that if only a few sell, investors hold less power) permalink fedilink source parent