59
Pipewire vs PulseAudio, general question (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What are the main differences between pipewire and pulseaudio? Which one is better? What are other alternative popular sound servers besides these two?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I’ve been running Pipewire in pro audio setup for my son and his band mates since the early days of the project. Granted I did run into some issues at first, but for a long time now it has been solid as a rock. With all of the plugins it is a joy to work with, no more Jack, Jack 2, Alsa, Pulse bridging and configuration nonsense, it all just ‘works’ now.

I would recommend it to anyone as a first option when setting up anything audio related on Linux now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I believe that PipeWire is really solid piece of software, but I couldn't just let go of JACK just yet. JACK just works and it's easy to modify important parameters like sample rate or buffer size. On PipeWire I still don't know how to quite do that, I get lost in all those configuration files, but I will get it someday.

    Also one more thing that might be niche, but it's important for me is JACK timecode (for synching i.e. a DAW with video player) which PipeWire doesn't support at all at the moment. Getting it work on PipeWire (converting JACK timecode to LTC or MTC) gets ugly pretty quickly. So I'm glad PipeWire allows to use it however I like it, either as JACK server or client.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent