▲ 135 ▼ All the historical evidence for Jesus in one room (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world to c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world 153 comments fedilink hide all child comments All the historical evidence for Jesus in one room
[+] jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which is more than what we can say about Jesus. Name a single eyewitness of him while he was alive who recorded it. Paul admits never seeing Jesus while he was alive, the twelve wrote no books, the Romans have no notes on the events. No one who supposedly saw any of the events managed to find quill and parchment. And what's more no one who heard second hand during the events recorded it. The Gospels are clear that news was spreading all over Judea and yet people writing about other would be Messiahs and political rebellions are silent about Jesus. Besides, and again this important, Socrates is a consistent believable story. We don't have multiple versions of his life that all go against each other, often within the same text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 2 years ago Again. Socrates had an eyewitness, Jesus did not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Which is more than what we can say about Jesus. Name a single eyewitness of him while he was alive who recorded it. Paul admits never seeing Jesus while he was alive, the twelve wrote no books, the Romans have no notes on the events. No one who supposedly saw any of the events managed to find quill and parchment. And what's more no one who heard second hand during the events recorded it. The Gospels are clear that news was spreading all over Judea and yet people writing about other would be Messiahs and political rebellions are silent about Jesus. Besides, and again this important, Socrates is a consistent believable story. We don't have multiple versions of his life that all go against each other, often within the same text. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 2 years ago Again. Socrates had an eyewitness, Jesus did not. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 2 years ago Again. Socrates had an eyewitness, Jesus did not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world [S] -1 points 2 years ago Again. Socrates had an eyewitness, Jesus did not. permalink fedilink source parent