▲ 870 ▼ 'Kids Online Safety Act' will deliberately target trans content, senator admits. (www.thepinknews.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 114 comments fedilink hide all child comments 'Kids Online Safety Act' will deliberately target trans content, senator admits.::undefined
[–] legion02@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Juliet was traditionally played by a man. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yes, because women were not allowed to act. Another discriminatory practice. What are you suggesting by bringing that up? Are you going to answer their questions, btw? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] legion02@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Was just pointing out how silly the argument is. You gonna ban stuff like because you’re too lazy to supervise your kid and they might read it? Can literally be applied to any content and doubly so when your example has a history of gender-bending. I'm personally against banning any of the content because how can people make decisions without knowledge? Gay and trans people exist whether you like it or not, pretending they don't is just bad parenting. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago It was better when it was just two men, nobody corrupting the thoughts of children with sex permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yes, because women were not allowed to act. Another discriminatory practice. What are you suggesting by bringing that up? Are you going to answer their questions, btw? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] legion02@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Was just pointing out how silly the argument is. You gonna ban stuff like because you’re too lazy to supervise your kid and they might read it? Can literally be applied to any content and doubly so when your example has a history of gender-bending. I'm personally against banning any of the content because how can people make decisions without knowledge? Gay and trans people exist whether you like it or not, pretending they don't is just bad parenting. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago It was better when it was just two men, nobody corrupting the thoughts of children with sex permalink fedilink source parent
[–] legion02@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Was just pointing out how silly the argument is. You gonna ban stuff like because you’re too lazy to supervise your kid and they might read it? Can literally be applied to any content and doubly so when your example has a history of gender-bending. I'm personally against banning any of the content because how can people make decisions without knowledge? Gay and trans people exist whether you like it or not, pretending they don't is just bad parenting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago It was better when it was just two men, nobody corrupting the thoughts of children with sex permalink fedilink source parent