โฒ 319 โผ The official way to chat with the European Union is with.... Facebook (fedia.io) submitted 2 years ago by atro_city@fedia.io to c/europe@feddit.org 26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[โ] smitty053@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (3 children) โฆ.email? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [โ] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) On the linked page there is a contact form with an input box for email address, so I guess if you contact them via the form they will reply in email. FB is the only option if you want to chat in a written form. The third option is a phone number you can call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Admax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Thank you for added context ! As long as there are alternatives to Messenger chat i think it's okay to have it. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago Snail mail? permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Admax@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* The image email has is the one if an old school slugish administration, probably the one physical mails had when emails came around. When I send an email to anyone, be it a company or an individual, I expect a reply in the next few days. But in chat I'm expecting a reply in a couple of hours. So I'd be much more inclined to a conversation via chat given the option. Also I'm not certain my experience with younger people and email is representative, but from what I've seen younger generations are not the most at ease with email. I think what's lacking here is the choice. Messenger is more appealing to a vast amount of people, but to some it might be the opposite, and those people need an lternative. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) On the linked page there is a contact form with an input box for email address, so I guess if you contact them via the form they will reply in email. FB is the only option if you want to chat in a written form. The third option is a phone number you can call. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Admax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Thank you for added context ! As long as there are alternatives to Messenger chat i think it's okay to have it. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Admax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Thank you for added context ! As long as there are alternatives to Messenger chat i think it's okay to have it. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Admax@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* The image email has is the one if an old school slugish administration, probably the one physical mails had when emails came around. When I send an email to anyone, be it a company or an individual, I expect a reply in the next few days. But in chat I'm expecting a reply in a couple of hours. So I'd be much more inclined to a conversation via chat given the option. Also I'm not certain my experience with younger people and email is representative, but from what I've seen younger generations are not the most at ease with email. I think what's lacking here is the choice. Messenger is more appealing to a vast amount of people, but to some it might be the opposite, and those people need an lternative. permalink fedilink source parent