▲ 513 ▼ What could possibly go wrong (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by simplejack@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 109 points 2 years ago (3 children) Are people forgetting that there is a list of names that chatgpt can't talk about? permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] tyler@programming.dev 51 points 2 years ago (1 child) The ones where people asked for their information to be removed, due to GDPR or other data privacy laws? Sure does seem like a different situation to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago* Rather people that sued OpenAI or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (3 children) In this case, I believe the screenshot is depicting DeepSeek (made by China, which vehemently denies the massacre at Tiananmen square) as whitewashing history. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* China's official narrative doesn't deny that something happened on that date. They paint it as the protestors' fault. They say that the army broke up a dangerous riot. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Give it another 60 or so years. It took the US Justice Department over 100 years to "Review and Evaluate" the Tulsa massacre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wonder if the censoring is on the open source self hosted model? The app runs Deepseek on Chinese servers so it makes sense that it would have censoring there, but what about on the actual offline model you can download? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago It’s my understanding that the open source deepseek does not include the data and you’d have to feed it your own data. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) What chatgpt does is irrelevant. This is still a problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yes but what chatgpt does has no impact on how bad what deepseek does actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago what chatgpt does is irrelevant what deep seek does is more importanter Muh stock permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tyler@programming.dev 51 points 2 years ago (1 child) The ones where people asked for their information to be removed, due to GDPR or other data privacy laws? Sure does seem like a different situation to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago* Rather people that sued OpenAI or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago* Rather people that sued OpenAI or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (3 children) In this case, I believe the screenshot is depicting DeepSeek (made by China, which vehemently denies the massacre at Tiananmen square) as whitewashing history. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* China's official narrative doesn't deny that something happened on that date. They paint it as the protestors' fault. They say that the army broke up a dangerous riot. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Give it another 60 or so years. It took the US Justice Department over 100 years to "Review and Evaluate" the Tulsa massacre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wonder if the censoring is on the open source self hosted model? The app runs Deepseek on Chinese servers so it makes sense that it would have censoring there, but what about on the actual offline model you can download? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago It’s my understanding that the open source deepseek does not include the data and you’d have to feed it your own data. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* China's official narrative doesn't deny that something happened on that date. They paint it as the protestors' fault. They say that the army broke up a dangerous riot. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Give it another 60 or so years. It took the US Justice Department over 100 years to "Review and Evaluate" the Tulsa massacre. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wonder if the censoring is on the open source self hosted model? The app runs Deepseek on Chinese servers so it makes sense that it would have censoring there, but what about on the actual offline model you can download? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago It’s my understanding that the open source deepseek does not include the data and you’d have to feed it your own data. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago It’s my understanding that the open source deepseek does not include the data and you’d have to feed it your own data. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) What chatgpt does is irrelevant. This is still a problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yes but what chatgpt does has no impact on how bad what deepseek does actually is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago what chatgpt does is irrelevant what deep seek does is more importanter Muh stock permalink fedilink source parent
[+] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yes but what chatgpt does has no impact on how bad what deepseek does actually is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yes but what chatgpt does has no impact on how bad what deepseek does actually is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago what chatgpt does is irrelevant what deep seek does is more importanter Muh stock permalink fedilink source parent
