Fun fact: the US already produces much more oil than it uses and exports most of it.

The "energy independency needs oil" argument is a false one made up by the fossil fuel industry and the corrupt politicians they own.

Their efforts, not a lack of feasibility, are the main impediments to transitioning to a renewable energy grid, which can be done surprisingly fast (a 50MW wind farm can be operational in 6 months, a 10MW one in only 2, and a solar farm in 6-12) and the resulting decentralised grid would be much more resilient in avoiding catastrophic failure than one focused on a few large fossil fuel burning plants that stop working every time it gets too hot or too cold.

In conclusion: your pro-fossil fuel argument is invalid and you've fallen for empty propaganda.

Lobbying for WHICH climate action group, though? Some are as good for climate action as Neera Tanden's CAP is for progress.

In fact, you're sounding like a more polite version of her right now with your exceedingly vague yet utterly false trumpeting of neoliberal saviours 🙄

And even then, they're much better than Republicans who can't detect and are extremely susceptible to foreign propaganda.

Of course, "much better than Republicans at resisting propaganda" is like "much better at bowling than an armadillo". The species just isn't built for it 🤷