you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -62 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It specifically requested DD/MM/YYYY format though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah... I am stoned but this looks like it should be valid and there is just a bug in the code.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I’m guessing the UI designer accidentally put in DD/MM/YY, when the code handles the date as MM/DD/YY.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sometimes if the developers don't specify, the date format can follow clients' settings, which can lead to unpredictable results like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments