you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Not with a hard R they don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    If you ban one you also ban the other. The -a is a respelling of -er, basically the same word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    ... no. Also, white people are not victims of institutional racism. Cracker is, at worst, a mild insult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago

    Where is there anything to do with white ? I was talking about why n-a/er isn't banned and how saying -er should be banned while keeping the -a variant doesn't make sense. I am for freespeech to me nothing should be banned like that, i am by no means advocating for the cracker one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Just admit you’re not American and have never stepped foot in America. Everyone - even the racists! - knows the difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Where did you get the idea that i was american ? Etymologically, the -a variant is a respelling of the -er which i believe is the original. This respelling is due to the "ghetto" spelling like gangaster->gangsta, same thing different pronunciation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh yeah is that a rule you just invented?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's a respelling banning one without banning the other doesn't make sense...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments