Memes

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world [B] 1 point 2 years ago

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

parent

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

No idea what the first link is even about, seems incomprehensible. The second link seems true but I have no idea what was said prior. The third link is about programming. Seems there is one potential example of an anarchist being called a tankie. Seems like the vast majority of times it's being used in reference to MLs still.

In all seriousness there are plenty of people who misuse words but tankie seems to have a very clear and easily defined definition, it has even remained the same historically. Comparing it to the crazies using 'woke' is dishonest at best.

parent

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

it has even remained the same historically

lmao no it hasn't. It originally referred specifically to people that supported the USSR putting down the Hungarian anti-communist protests. By the time "tankie" became a word (that only really ever had relevance in the UK) Stalin was long dead.

parent

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Yea, people that supported a dictatorial regime with socialist aesthetics as in the USSR. What part of that has changed?

parent

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

The USSR was literally more democratic than bourgeois democracy.

parent

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

It really depends on which bourgeois democracy. I may agree if compared to the US (I'm not too educated on the US so I could be wrong) but few others.

Though I fail to understand how that has anything to do with the topic of tankie having a consistent definition.

parent

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

You claim that the USSR was a dictatorship with socialist aesthetics.

Also, no, no bourgeois democracy is or was as democratic as the USSR. Look up dictatorship of the bourgeoisie vs dictatorship of the proletariat.

parent

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Dictatorship of the proletariat as Marx wrote has never been achieved and arguably(Depending on how naive you believe Lenin was) has never even been worked towards. MLs bastardization of that in the form of a vanguard party is just a different dictatorship of the bourgeoisie as it creates a ruling class.

parent

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

MLs bastardization of that in the form of a vanguard party is just a different dictatorship of the bourgeoisie as it creates a ruling class.

Have you read marxist theory? What have you read? This comes off as grossly misinformed.