you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

The way some people defend AI generated images reminds me of the way some people defend the act of tracing other people's art without the artist's permission and uploading it while claiming they made it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 2 years ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Someone stealing any physical property is likely bad for one or more reasons.

    Also, you can't steal an idea or a concept. Copying digital information doesn't deprive the creator of the original. Copying isn't theft.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    It's not 'art' ffs. It's an image. Sure, it may look nice, but it has 0 meaning, thought, or emotion behind it. This is just another scheme by the rich to milk us some more, as it promotes the idea that art is just a pretty image people pay to look at (consoooom). That's NOT what art is. Art is made by a living being, go pick up a pencil.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    10 hours of jingling keys to be amazed by on YouTube dot com

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    If you think that images created by a generative model are amazing, you might also be interested in 10 hours of keys jingling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments