▲ 459 ▼ I apparently got shadow banned almost a year ago from blahaj, for a comment I made on lemmy.world (lemmy.sdf.org) submitted 2 years ago* by wesker@lemmy.sdf.org to c/modabuse@lemmy.sdf.org 282 comments fedilink hide all child comments For the record I was posting in support of inclusive language, but pointing out that context and convention matter. They seem to have even scrubbed my comment from their instance, lol.
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) I'm gen x dude also has no gender. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) i kinda agree but does "i fuck dudes" sound right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Its your choice. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago It depends on the context. The term has generally become more generic, but some contexts can put it back to its original gendered meaning. permalink fedilink source parent [–] xor@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) dude is masculine in every definition i’ve found (looked it up) except for a city slicker new to a ranch… i’ve always known it to be gender neutral… but i have a female friend that gets offended every time someone calls her that. but the fact that it keeps happening means that it’s gender neutral to all of those people too (she’s a fairly feminine female). that said, it’s best to just call people terms that they are comfortable with, not ones that you’re comfortable calling them. personally, i find calling a single person they/them a little obtuse, but it’s not really that hard. (slightly confusing when there’s a question of whether im referring to them or a group of people). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Except when it comes to cultural/generational uses of words. Every generation has words they use in a altered way. Dude was one such word when I was young. It was used by my generation in a way that didn't exactly match the definition. Just like all the other generations use words out context with their written definitions. Its why I laugh when the younger generations get mad because they think they invented the concept. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xor@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago yeah, it’s almost as if language is an evolving thing…. but fuck that noise, i only accept definitions from the 1876 edition of Merrium-Webster… all other usages are wrong. (i do seriously had when the nounify a verb like “cringe” or making “sus” mean anything at all bad… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) i kinda agree but does "i fuck dudes" sound right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Its your choice. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago It depends on the context. The term has generally become more generic, but some contexts can put it back to its original gendered meaning. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Its your choice. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago It depends on the context. The term has generally become more generic, but some contexts can put it back to its original gendered meaning. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xor@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) dude is masculine in every definition i’ve found (looked it up) except for a city slicker new to a ranch… i’ve always known it to be gender neutral… but i have a female friend that gets offended every time someone calls her that. but the fact that it keeps happening means that it’s gender neutral to all of those people too (she’s a fairly feminine female). that said, it’s best to just call people terms that they are comfortable with, not ones that you’re comfortable calling them. personally, i find calling a single person they/them a little obtuse, but it’s not really that hard. (slightly confusing when there’s a question of whether im referring to them or a group of people). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Except when it comes to cultural/generational uses of words. Every generation has words they use in a altered way. Dude was one such word when I was young. It was used by my generation in a way that didn't exactly match the definition. Just like all the other generations use words out context with their written definitions. Its why I laugh when the younger generations get mad because they think they invented the concept. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xor@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago yeah, it’s almost as if language is an evolving thing…. but fuck that noise, i only accept definitions from the 1876 edition of Merrium-Webster… all other usages are wrong. (i do seriously had when the nounify a verb like “cringe” or making “sus” mean anything at all bad… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Except when it comes to cultural/generational uses of words. Every generation has words they use in a altered way. Dude was one such word when I was young. It was used by my generation in a way that didn't exactly match the definition. Just like all the other generations use words out context with their written definitions. Its why I laugh when the younger generations get mad because they think they invented the concept. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xor@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago yeah, it’s almost as if language is an evolving thing…. but fuck that noise, i only accept definitions from the 1876 edition of Merrium-Webster… all other usages are wrong. (i do seriously had when the nounify a verb like “cringe” or making “sus” mean anything at all bad… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xor@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago yeah, it’s almost as if language is an evolving thing…. but fuck that noise, i only accept definitions from the 1876 edition of Merrium-Webster… all other usages are wrong. (i do seriously had when the nounify a verb like “cringe” or making “sus” mean anything at all bad… permalink fedilink source parent