144
Computer scientist shows how to tamper with Georgia voting machine, in election security trial: “All it takes is five seconds and a Bic pen.” (www.ajc.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Computer scientist shows how to tamper with Georgia voting machine, in election security trial: “All it takes is five seconds and a Bic pen.”::An expert witness for plaintiffs seeking to bar Georgia's touchscreen voting machines showed a crowded courtroom how he could tamper with election res

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Electronic voting works wonders. All you need to sacrifice is anonymity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Which is why it doesn't work in real elections.

    Voter anonymity is critical to a functioning democracy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Uh, no. We already have dozens of publicly characterestics to discrinate people against, we can handle one more for a huge benefit of never ever doubting election count results again.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    No, just no.

    The moment voter secrecy is gone, you will have a far, far , far worse situation.

    The moment you can verify what a person voted for, then you have opened the door for violence, intimidation and voter bribery.

    The point of voter secrecy is to prevent others from being able to force you to vote on your own.

    Immagine a wife of a MAGA husband, with voter secrecy she would have the option to hide voting for the Democrts, without it she would be able to be forced by her husband to vote for the republicans.

    This is simply because he would be able to verify her vote, with voter secrecy he has to trust her. (Obviously there are ways he still could come close to verifying her vote, but there remains options for her)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm coming from an oppressive dictatorship that kills people for disagreeing with them. One thing to enables them to is voter anonymity. An oppressive MAGA husband example is cute, ofc, but I wasn't solving "how do we make people vote with there heart is", this is kinda out of scope and definitely not crucial for a functional democracy, but wishlist-grade at best.

    Now, voter bribery is a good one. Never thought of that and can see how this could be a much more sizeable problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ok but how would a lack of voter secrecy prevent the government from killing people who voted "wrong"?

    To me that just seems like it would make it easier.

    I am a Swede and have luckily never had to think about these things, if I am being arrogant with my staunch support of voter secrecy, I want to know.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •