As part of the devs farewell message on their site, they have included malicious code to make each visitor sends 2,000 requests to the dbzer0 servers in an attempt to DDOS and take the instance offline.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 352 points 13 hours ago (48 children)

I don't think I've ever witnessed someone going so hard off the rails. It's been an entertaining few days really.

  • source
  • hideshow 52 child comments
  • [–] 185 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (19 children)

    It’s what happens when someone with underdeveloped empathy gets caught doing something they know is wrong, resulting in emotional overload.

    It’s textbook toddler tantrum.

    With stunted empathy, people seeking an explanation and apology are met with increasingly greater resistance.

    And like textbook, they claim to be the victim. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are lying about receiving death threats.

    What’s crazy is they could have simply:

    • Apologised
    • Explained the intent to reduce toxicity
    • Agreed there was a lack of transparency
    • Refactored their existing “enable toxicity mode” feature into a clearer, toggleable blocklist feature

    But no. They were caught while they were secretly trying to play internet dictator and refused to empathise with others that were hurt and shocked to find out a tool they were using was receiving undisclosed payloads to use to censor communities and individuals.

    I strongly implore everyone to leave this developer alone. Jokingly asking to be added to the list etc empowers them to continue to play the victim. They do not deserve attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

    Honestly, I can see a "curated" list of user/instance bans as a feature, similar to unlock. But let people chose them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    If he had just implemented the list as a default that anyone could edit, he would have gotten pretty much what he wanted. I mean, some people would have edited the list, some would have deleted the list, but most people are lazy or uninformed and would have simply accepted the default.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (16 replies)
  • load more comments (44 replies)