you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (17 children)

votes third party

No not like that

Seriously though, I think it's important to confront and admit that voting for the lesser evil does legitimize the evil they do, even if the greater evil does it worse. Because critically digesting both that fact alongside the fact that voting for the lesser evil really does result in better outcomes for society is what will actually get the hesitant on board with going and doing it. If you try to dismiss or handwave that fact, you are dismissing and handwaving the very real concerns of the disillusioned non-participants. Acknowledging the dissonance is far better.

I think it's also important to point out that while direct action and social organizing are the most effective things things you can do to change society, they are incredibly time consuming while voting usually takes 5 - 30 minutes. And if you're actually interested in the former, there's little to no excuse to avoid the latter.

Just whatever you do, don't shame people for being disillusioned. That makes people really dig in their heels.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    voting for the lesser evil really does result in better outcomes for society

    Not when the Lesser Evil gets progressively more evil over time to try and pull votes from the Greater Evil camp. They have no incentive to implement any policies you're in favor of as long as they have your guaranteed support. If the next Democrat promises to be as worthless as the last one, don't vote for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    It actually does, even considering that. That's just how bad the greater evil party is. There's a lot of space for the lesser evil party in their wake. But yes it does get worse overall either way. That's why while voting is important, you really should be doing something beyond that as well, if you really care. And if you really care enough to do something beyond that, then merely voting should be trivial for you to manage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Not in the long run. "Vote blue no matter who" is how we end up in 2036, with the republican on the ballot promising to execute all trans people, and the democrat promising to merely jail them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Agreed, not in the long run. Voting is like stop the bleed on a traumatic injury. It'll keep you alive in the short term so you can get more comprehensive care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    So if you know that it's harmful in the long term, then when will you stop voting for the lesser evil?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    When the organizing and fighting that that you do beyond voting finally pays off. Like back to the analogy, if a wound is all dressed and banaged and healing, you no longer have to worry about stop the bleed.

    Realisticay though, for the rest of your life. Because these are very large social moves that typically happen over generations. Unless you're the next Che Guavara or something. In which case hell yeah go you.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (14 replies)