https://lemmy.world/post/49736885

If you follow AI news at all as part of your self-hosting interests, you may have become aware recently that open AI (the frontier lab between behind chat GPT) has admitted (loosely) culpability in an cyber attack against HuggingFace (the major repository of open-weight models.)

The details that present are somewhat sketchy, but the gist of it is that open AI seems to have given unrestricted access to a AI agent, which then attacked hugging face, who in a twist of deliciousness, used an open source agent to defend themselves.

I'd joke and tell you to make sure that you haven't left any open ports on your router, but if you're here reading this I think probably you know better than that.

Less comically, there's a weird intersection here between self-hosting, sovereignty and encroachment by big tech that is worth pay attention to.

It should certainly spur people on to seriously consider self-hosting as much of their infrastructure as they can (and securing it) if this is the preview of things to come.

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

I just wish I'd bought more SSDs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 5 days ago (11 children)

What does self hosting look like in a world full of malicious AI agents?

I’m thinking of this post/thread from Veronica explains, where she explains that her hosted services are accessible only locally because tbe security headache isn’t worth it: https://explains.social/@veronica/statuses/01KWJCGV27JVBHP21E2JNWDBFH

As someone who doesn’t self-host but could and would want to, the state of AI has basically scared me off.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    yeah - i am now thinking i want to move away from anything that leaves me exposed. i have a few services that are nice to be able to access remotely, but it’s time to reconsider how much i actually NEED to access those services.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Consider only exposing a VPN service, like Wireguard.

    Then when you are away from home, it's one tap / click to be back on your LAN again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    You don't even need to lift a finger. I use WG Tunnel, which turns on my VPN as soon as I leave my WiFi. I'm always tunneled or home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (1 child)

    some kind of wireguard proxy would be nice though to not expose my home IP address wherever I go (guest wifi networks)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)