1
The Bitter Lesson (www.incompleteideas.net)
submitted 4 hours ago by to c/Aii@programming.dev
2
 
 
3
 
 

Kimi Linear which is a hybrid attention model designed to replace standard full attention while fixing the extreme memory and compute bottlenecks that happen during long context tasks and reinforcement learning. They built a custom linear attention module called Kimi Delta Attention and interleaved it with standard Multi-Head Latent Attention layers at a three to one ratio. It turns out that their custom layer improves on earlier gated linear models by using a channel-wise forget gate instead of a coarse head-wise one. The fine-grained gating gives the model much better control over its recurrent memory. They also came up with a chunkwise parallel algorithm that makes it incredibly hardware efficient compared to older matrix formulations.

A 48 billion parameter mixture of experts model with 3 billion active parameters and trained on 1.4 trillion tokens consistently beat a pure full attention baseline and another hybrid baseline across general knowledge, math, and coding benchmarks. Because of the three to one hybrid structure it cuts key-value cache memory usage by up to 75%, and scaling up to a one million token context window Kimi Linear hits a decoding throughput that is six times faster than standard full attention. It also showed superior scaling and convergence during reinforcement learning phases. Extending the training to 5.7 trillion tokens scored a 94.8 on the RULER benchmark at a one million context length. Getting this level of performance while drastically slashing memory requirements makes hybrid linear architectures a strong candidate for the next generation of reasoning models.

4
 
 

Kimi K3 is a massive open weights Mixture-of-Experts model with 2.8 trillion total parameters and 104 billion active parameters per token, and it is able to process text, images, and video natively within a 1 mil token context window. Combining Kimi Delta Attention for efficient long-sequence processing with Attention Residuals and Stable LatentMoE gave a 2.5 times improvement in scaling efficiency over their previous K2 model.

The new version of the model is also trained on agentic tasks like autonomous web development, kernel optimization, and verifiable visual reasoning inside isolated microVM sandboxes. These specialized capabilities were then combined into a single model using multi-teacher on-policy distillation.

Kimi K3 consistently outperforms other open models like GLM 5.2 as well as proprietary models like Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 across coding, reasoning, and multimodal tasks. While its overall performance still trails the absolute top proprietary models like Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol, its results are comparable and it is able to deliver them at a fraction of their inference cost.

5
6
7
The Tool Is Not the Author (www.poppastring.com)
8
9
 
 

Desperately trying to find a use-case for their inferior AI. I feel like their idea pool was always at absolute 0 but now it's going even below that.

Let's have MetaAI raise our kids everyone!

10
 
 

Goal: Take a recording of someone speaking, pass it through a CLI or GUI, output a recording with the speaker's voice replaced by an AI voice.

I know there are closed-source or hosted services that do this, but they are a privacy risk and most surely also continue training their models on what users submit. The opensource solutions I have seen (last I checked 6 months ago or so) were all extremely outdated (around the beginning of the ChatGPT release) and required training using thousands of voice samples.

Surely somebody has done this before and didn't need to be an expert in the field to do so...

Non-solutions:

  • hosted services (elevenlabs, chatGPT, Gemini, ...)
  • "train your own AI"
11
12
LLMs reward expertise (www.seangoedecke.com)
13
Qwen-Audio-3.0-TTS (funaudiollm.github.io)
submitted 5 days ago by to c/Aii@programming.dev
14
15
16
17
18
19
 
 

Training LLMs requires thousands of accelerators that need to be wired together with ultra fast cables because they constantly share intermediate states and gradients during every single step of the optimization process. Building and maintaining a single compute cluster of that size is something that only large corps can afford to do.

Instead, we could piece together spare computing resources that happen to be scattered across the world. A new distributed optimization algorithm called DiLoCo, which stands for Distributed Low Communication, allows training language model across multiple smaller islands of devices that are poorly connected.

Rather than forcing the chips to sync up after every single calculation they let each island train independently for hundreds of steps before updating the global parameters. This approach takes heavy inspiration from a concept called Federated Learning where devices do a bunch of work locally before syncing their model replicas.

The technical breakthrough here is in the way they structure the math behind the inner and outer learning steps using an optimizer called AdamW for the local training steps on each island and then apply Nesterov momentum when gathering and blending all those outer gradients together.

Their approach was tested on the popular C4 dataset and proved that an 8 worker setup performs just as well as a fully synchronized model while communicating 500 times less. It is also remarkably resilient since the model still converges even if the data distribution is wildly different on every worker or if compute islands randomly drop offline during training.

This is a massive step towards being able to train models completely outside corporate control, paving the way towards genuine community driven projects developing this technology in open source fashion. It would be possible to build something akin to SETI@Home where people contribute some of their idle computing power towards training that's done using a distributed network of regular computers across the world.

20
 
 

AI's Grok Build coding CLI was uploading entire Git repositories, full commit history and all, to a Google Cloud Storage bucket run by xAI, not just the files a coding task needed.

A researcher publishing as cereblab, testing version 0.2.93, captured one of those uploads, cloned the git bundle out of the intercepted request, and pulled back a file the agent had been told in plain terms not to open.

The upload rode a separate channel from the model itself, and the byte split is hard to argue with. On a 12 GB repo of files the model never read, model-turn traffic to /v1/responses came to about 192 KB while the storage channel to /v1/storage moved 5.10 GiB, a roughly 27,800x gap between what the model needed and what left the machine.

21
22
23
24
25
view more: next ›