[–] 5 points 1 week ago

Yes, I would very much like that. I've always had the vague feeling that I do and enjoyed being with and around children, but started thinking about it more when I was together with my now-ex since we were discussing future plans.

Children are joy, discovery, love, and they are the future. I expect it might be both the most difficult but also rewarding venture one can set out on.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    Still use my 5T. Absolute tank of a phone. Considering replacing the battery and charging/aux port to refresh it for another 4 year run.

    Only chink is the glue holding on the camera lens is giving out

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    That would be decidedly tragic. Your history posts are basically the most interesting things on here. I think a lot of people will be more mildly disappointed, including myself, to see you go.

    If you do leave, thanks for the time you were here. You have been appreciated!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago*

    I'm referring to reasoning here as in the connection to the arguments they use to sell their politics to voters. Countering a dishonest broker is difficult, but if democracy is going to work at all, it is a necessity. In any case, there is a certain irony in the AFD being Russia friendly, considering they began their path to prominence during another admin that was soft on Russia.

    The Merkel era of the 00's-10's saw dismantlement of German energy independence, Russian gas contracts "to keep the peace", not backing Ukraine for NATO & "wir schaffen das". Talk about not wanting to learn from history...

    This happened to the NPD already and it was the right thing to do.

    I thought both the NPD & heimat are still around and kicking in Germany? They're some next level nasty shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    And the problems you listed aren’t the things they’re addressing.

    They claim to (read their party program), and they've convinced millions to agree regardless of how we feel about that.

    There is no reasoning.

    This is the easy way out, dismissing them outright, simply retreating. Without understanding and addressing their claims, however false they may be, you are fundamentally handicapped in challenging them - it is one of the key reasons that the AFD have managed to become so large in the first place.

    Such rhetoric might get clamor and agreement from those who already reject their ideas, but is unlikely to convince many, if anybody in the other camp.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    How is this so difficult to understand?

    Did you even read my comment?

    Let me repeat the most important part for you:

    every citizen should have a right to equal representation, a right to be heard. No ifs’ and buts’ and no “but not like that” if I find their opinions unpalatable.

    That is my conviction, regardless of ideology. It doesn't matter how much you highlight what the AFD stand for, because it is fundamentally irrelevant to my opinion on the subject.

    Those aren’t real problems.

    Which problems?

    Decreasing standard of living? Rising energy prices? High home prices? A stagnating economy?

    You don't convince someone to change ideology by saying "your problems aren't real". You do it by identifying the real problems, because I promise you that they exist. Then, convince them that a better solution exists than what their current ideology proposes.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    No, it's like saying the police shouldn't fight crime by breaking the law, because it undermines trust in the legal system.

    For a prime example of that in action, see the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -2 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    Well, this is democracy undermining itself. Parties with millions of supporters don't just randomly pop up for no reason. They come about due to real people having real problems.

    Banning parties is a good way to become blind to that.

    That is just a pragmatic argument, independent of my conviction that every citizen should have a right to equal representation, a right to be heard. No ifs' and buts' and no "but not like that" if I find their opinions unpalatable.

    It is the same foundation I stand on to assert my own right. I will have my say. If that were taken away, I'd be inclined to tear it all down.

    One very angry person can do a lot of damage today. How about the ten million who voted for AFD in the most recent German election? Or maybe just the seventy thousand who are active members? They are surely more extreme than you or I. That's more people than there are jail cells in Germany right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world
     

    Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. None of these nations have an minimim hourly wage enshrined in law. Instead many of the base terms of employment, including wages, are decided via collective bargaining between sector trade unions and representatives of public sector and business interest organizations.

    Minimum wage decided by politics is something taken for granted in many parts of the world, but ultimately it's a question that most of all affects the suppliers (employees) and buyers (employers). The government will always be behind the times in legislation and have many other interests to juggle than yours - don't just be a passive participant in the market.

    I live in Sweden by the way, so feel free to ask me questions on the topic and I'll do my best to answer.

    view more: next ›